MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Prospective Study of Voriconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) in Patients with Acute Leukemia.

2009· article· en· W2595300774 on OpenAlexaff
Jack T Seki, Joseph Brandwein, Richard E. Ward, Narinder Paul, Heather Russell, Deepali Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVoriconazoleInternal medicineTherapeutic drug monitoringAspergillosisGastroenterologyProspective cohort studyFluconazoleNeutropeniaToxicitySurgeryPharmacokineticsImmunologyAntifungal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1018 Poster Board I-40 Background: Voriconazole (VOR) is an expanded spectrum azole that is often used to treat suspected or proven invasive aspergillosis (IA). VOR plasma drug levels are not routinely monitored and their correlation with clinical response and toxicity is unclear. We sought to clarify the kinetics of levels in patients started on VOR and their relationship with CYP2C19 genotype and clinical outcomes. Methods: We prospectively enrolled inpatients undergoing induction or consolidation chemotherapy for AML who were able to take oral medications and started on VOR for suspected invasive aspergillosis (IA). All patients received an initial intravenous loading dose of 6mg/kg bid for two doses, then 200mg bid. VOR dose could be increased at the physician's discretion. Trough VOR levels (μg/mL) were monitored at days 0,2,4,6 and performed using HPLC. Patients also underwent genotyping for CYP2C19. Clinical and radiologic responses were graded independently by two physicians. Hepatotoxicity was correlated to peak VOR levels. Results: We enrolled 33 patients of which 60.6% were male and 39.4% female. Mean age was 60.2±15.4 yrs. The distribution of peak VOR levels was as follows: <2 μg/mL (n=6); 2-6 μg/mL (n=22); >6 μg/mL (n=5). Mild hepatotoxicity (liver enzymes greater than 2x baseline) was seen in 6/22 (27.2%) of patients with levels between 2-6 μg/mL and 1/5 (20%) of patients with levels >6 μg/mL. No hepatotoxicity was noted in those with peak VOR <2 μg/mL. No significant correlation was seen in mg/kg dose of VOR and levels. Of the 33 patients, 19 (57.6%) met the EORTC/MSG criteria for possible, probable, or proven invasive fungal disease. Of these 9 (47.4%) patients had a response to therapy. Mean peak VOR levels in responders vs. nonresponders was 3.78 vs. 3.12 (p=0.63). Response to therapy was 2/2 (100%) if levels were <2 μg/mL, 6/14 (42.9%) if levels were 2-6 μg/mL, and 1/3 (33%) if levels were >6 μg/mL. Breakthrough infections occurred in 5/33 (15.2%) patients given VOR, all of whom had peak levels between 2-6 μg/mL. Genotyping was performed on 11/33 (33.3%) patients and included slow metabolizers (n=5; median peak VOR 3.0), rapid metabolizers (n=5; median peak VOR 3.0) and undetermined (n=1). Genotype did not correlate with clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The majority of patients attained voriconazole levels > 2 μg/mL by day 6 of treatment. Voriconazole levels do not appear to predict response to therapy or breakthrough infection although mild hepatotoxicity can occur if levels are >2 μg/mL. Disclosures: Seki: Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kumar:Merck: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility→French-language works237,207→