A Prospective Study of Voriconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) in Patients with Acute Leukemia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 1018 Poster Board I-40 Background: Voriconazole (VOR) is an expanded spectrum azole that is often used to treat suspected or proven invasive aspergillosis (IA). VOR plasma drug levels are not routinely monitored and their correlation with clinical response and toxicity is unclear. We sought to clarify the kinetics of levels in patients started on VOR and their relationship with CYP2C19 genotype and clinical outcomes. Methods: We prospectively enrolled inpatients undergoing induction or consolidation chemotherapy for AML who were able to take oral medications and started on VOR for suspected invasive aspergillosis (IA). All patients received an initial intravenous loading dose of 6mg/kg bid for two doses, then 200mg bid. VOR dose could be increased at the physician's discretion. Trough VOR levels (μg/mL) were monitored at days 0,2,4,6 and performed using HPLC. Patients also underwent genotyping for CYP2C19. Clinical and radiologic responses were graded independently by two physicians. Hepatotoxicity was correlated to peak VOR levels. Results: We enrolled 33 patients of which 60.6% were male and 39.4% female. Mean age was 60.2±15.4 yrs. The distribution of peak VOR levels was as follows: <2 μg/mL (n=6); 2-6 μg/mL (n=22); >6 μg/mL (n=5). Mild hepatotoxicity (liver enzymes greater than 2x baseline) was seen in 6/22 (27.2%) of patients with levels between 2-6 μg/mL and 1/5 (20%) of patients with levels >6 μg/mL. No hepatotoxicity was noted in those with peak VOR <2 μg/mL. No significant correlation was seen in mg/kg dose of VOR and levels. Of the 33 patients, 19 (57.6%) met the EORTC/MSG criteria for possible, probable, or proven invasive fungal disease. Of these 9 (47.4%) patients had a response to therapy. Mean peak VOR levels in responders vs. nonresponders was 3.78 vs. 3.12 (p=0.63). Response to therapy was 2/2 (100%) if levels were <2 μg/mL, 6/14 (42.9%) if levels were 2-6 μg/mL, and 1/3 (33%) if levels were >6 μg/mL. Breakthrough infections occurred in 5/33 (15.2%) patients given VOR, all of whom had peak levels between 2-6 μg/mL. Genotyping was performed on 11/33 (33.3%) patients and included slow metabolizers (n=5; median peak VOR 3.0), rapid metabolizers (n=5; median peak VOR 3.0) and undetermined (n=1). Genotype did not correlate with clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The majority of patients attained voriconazole levels > 2 μg/mL by day 6 of treatment. Voriconazole levels do not appear to predict response to therapy or breakthrough infection although mild hepatotoxicity can occur if levels are >2 μg/mL. Disclosures: Seki: Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kumar:Merck: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".