MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595505744 · doi:10.33137/rr.v37i3.22480

Amore punito e disarmato. Parola e immagine da Petrarca all’Arcadia

2015· article· it· W2595505744 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francesco Lucioli, Antonio Rossini

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcadiaE learningArtComputer scienceLiteratureWorld Wide WebThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While undeniably a work of vast erudition and great scholarly accomplishment, supported by a rich bibliography, Lucioli's study (2013 winner of the "Premio Tesi di Dottorato, " a prize established by the Sapienza Università of Rome) is perhaps hobbled by its original conception as a dissertation, a form that can tend to polycentrism and to the over-analysis of nuance at the expense of a unifying vision.Presented in six chapters followed by an iconography section, a bibliography, and an index of names, this valuable contribution focuses on the topos of Cupid's defeat as the God is robbed (mostly by women) of his arms-imagery that proved surprisingly resonant in Italian literature from the fourteenth to the eighteenth century.This theme or, rather, mythologeme, indeed enjoyed a sustained and healthy circulation, as Lucioli amply and convincingly demonstrates.Given the historical and geographical span of its scope, the first section of this work is difficult to summarize.Entitled "Mito e allegoria: le fonti classiche e la loro ricezione" (Myth and allegory: classical sources and their reception), it evokes the origins of the literary cliché in question.Highlighting the two original cores of the mythologeme, namely the imprisonment of Cupid and then his punishment, Lucioli surveys a panoply of texts: the Cupido Cruciatus by Ausonius, the Anthologia Graeca, the lyric production of Anachreon, Lucian's Dialogue of the Gods, the Elegies of Tibullus and Propertius, the Metamorphosis of Apuleius, a poem by Modestinus, and, obviously, Ovid's love-themed works.The scholar also briefly explains how the topos was received during the Renaissance and interpreted more as a "triumph of chastity" than a "punishment of love."The latter theme, as well as several insightful forays into the iconography and iconology of Cupid's debacle, occupy the two following chapters, titled respectively "Il Triumphus Pudicitie: modelli e rappresentazione" (The Triumphus Pudicitie: models and representation) and "Parola e immagine nell'età dell'Umanesimo" (Word and image in the age of Humanism).The chapters in question are the true heart of Lucioli's work: brilliantly investigating, from Petrarch's Triumphus Pudicitie to the poems in ottava rima by Luigi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207