MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect of the novel therapeutic cancer vaccine formulation DPX-0907 on multifunctional T-cell responses in ovarian, breast, and prostate cancer patients.

2012· article· en· W2595518715 on OpenAlexaff
Neil L. Berinstein, Mohan Karkada, Rita Nigam, Michael A. Morse, John Nemunaitis, Gurkamal Chatta, Howard L. Kaufman, Kunle Odunsi, Genevieve Weir, Lisa D. MacDonald, Marianne M. Stanford, Marc Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsImmunovaccine (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmune systemAdjuvantImmunogenicityProstate cancerBreast cancerCancerCancer vaccineAntigenOvarian cancerImmunologyProstateOncologyAdverse effectInternal medicineImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2588 Background: To increase the efficacy of peptide cancer vaccines, we developed a novel vaccine platform called DepoVax, an adjuvanted water-free depot formulation with the ability to generate enhanced immune responses. Naturally processed HLA-A2 restricted peptides that are selectively presented by breast, ovarian and prostate cancer cell lines, but not by normal HLA-A2+ cells, were used as antigens with a proprietary adjuvant and a T helper peptide epitope to create a therapeutic cancer vaccine, DPX-0907. Methods: A phase I clinical study was designed to examine the safety and immune activating potential of DPX-0907 in advanced stage breast, ovarian and prostate cancer patients. A total of 23 late stage cancer patients were recruited and were divided into two dose volume cohorts in a three immunization clinical protocol. Results: DPX-0907 proved to be safe with no serious adverse effects related to the vaccine reported. Of those evaluable for immunogenicity, all breast cancer patients (3/3), most of ovarian (5/6) and one third of prostate (3/9) cancer patients demonstrated immune response to one or more of seven antigenic peptides, resulting in a 61% response rate. Immune responses correlated with achievement of CR, PR or SD to last treatment. No difference in immune response rate or magnitude was seen between the two dose groups. DPX-0907 displayed strong immune induction potential, with 73% of immune responders showing responses with just one dose of vaccine. In 83% of responders, immune responses were detected at ≥2 time points post vaccination and 64% had a persistent immune response at one month post last vaccination. Immune monitoring showed peptide-specific CD8 T cells, and these T cells were able to secrete multiple Th1 cytokines indicating their multifunctionality, a feature attributable to cells that mediate protective responses. Conclusions: These data support the ability of DPX-0907 to elicit Th1 dominated, specific immunity and support the rationale for further testing in immunologically competent cancer patients. The novel DepoVax formulation may promote multifunctional memory responses with peptides from other tumor associated antigens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→