MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595526824 · doi:10.1117/12.2253879

Registration pipeline for pulmonary free-breathing <sup>1</sup>H MRI ventilation measurements

2017· article· en· W2595526824 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fumin Guo, Dante P. I. Capaldi, Robert Di Cesare, Aaron Fenster, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntraclass correlationCorrelation coefficientNuclear medicineReproducibilityCoefficient of variationMagnetic resonance imagingComputer scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceBreathingImage registrationAlgorithmMedicinePhysicsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsRadiologyStatisticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Our aim was to develop a clinically-practical and physiologically-relevant approach for regional structure-function measurements of the lung using Fourier decomposition of free-breathing pulmonary magnetic resonance imaging (FDMRI). Methods: Ten patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease provided written informed consent to a study protocol approved by Health Canada and completed pulmonary function tests, 1H/hyperpolarized noble gas and free-breathing pulmonary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during a single 2-hour visit. Free-breathing <sup>1</sup>H MRI was simultaneously segmented using a multi-region coupled continuous max-flow approach by exploring primal/dual analysis and convex optimization techniques. The segmented free-breathing 1H MRI lung was registered using deformable registration approach that was developed using dual and convex optimization methods to compensate for respiratory/cardiac motion. Fourier decomposition of the co-registered lung was used to generate pulmonary functional information that was quantified as ventilation-defect-percent (VDP). The pipeline was implemented on a GPU for speed-up. Lung segmentation accuracy was measured by comparing algorithm and manual lung masks using Dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC). FD-VDP was compared to <sup>3</sup>He-VDP using Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The reproducibility of our algorithm was measured using coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for DSC and FD-VDP. Results: The pipeline yielded a whole lung DSC of 95.7&plusmn;1.7% and FD-VDP that were correlated with <sup>3</sup>He-VDP (r = 0.81, p = 0.004). CoV (ICC) were 0.4% (0.98) and 4.1% (0.98) for whole lung DSC and FD-VDP, respectively. The proposed approach requires ~45 min for parallel implementation with minimal user interaction. Conclusion: The proposed approach provides a clinically-practical pipeline to generate regional pulmonary structure-function measurements using free-breathing pulmonary <sup>1</sup>HMRI with promising potential for widespread clinical translation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207