MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Copper transporter CTR1 expression and tissue platinum concentration in NSCLC.

2013· article· en· W2595553254 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak Kilari, Ximing Tang, Chi-Wan Chow, Junya Fujimoto, Neda Kalhor, Stephen G. Swisher, Ignacio I. Wistuba, David J. Stewart, Zahid H. Siddik, Eric S. Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunohistochemistryMedicineLung cancerStainingChemotherapyInternal medicineOncologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2601 Background: Platinum (Pt) resistance is a major limitation in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously demonstrated that low tissue Pt concentration in NSCLC tumor specimens was significantly associated with reduced tumor response and worse survival. Furthermore, low expression of the copper transporter CTR1, a transporter of Pt uptake is reported to be associated with poor clinical outcome following Pt-based therapy in NSCLC patients. However, a defect in CTR1expression as a causative factor in reduced Pt accumulation in NSCLC tissues is not well-established. We investigated the relationship between tissue Pt concentrations and CTR1 expression in NSCLC specimens. Methods: We identified paraffin-embedded NSCLC tissue blocks from 30 patients who underwent neoadjuvant Pt-based chemotherapy with known tissue Pt concentrations at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Expression of CTR1 was determined by immunohistochemistry with adequate controls; 0 = undetectable; 1+ = barely detectable staining; 2+ = readily appreciable staining; and 3+ = dark brown staining. Pt concentration was compared between different CTR1 expression groups. Results: Tissue Pt concentration significantly correlated with tumor response in 30 patients who received neoadjuvant Pt-based chemotherapy (P<0.001). There was an uneven distribution of CTR1 expression scores with a majority of specimens demonstrating scores of 2+ (N=15, 50%). There were 2 specimens with no detectable CTR1 expression (score of 0) and 6 patients with a score of 3+. Patients with undetectable CTR1 expression in their tumors had significantly lower Pt concentrations compared to those with scores of 3+ (P=0.014). Furthermore, those with undetectable CTR1 expression had reduced tumor response compared to those with scores of 3+ following Pt-based chemotherapy (P=0.039). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to correlate CTR1 expression in clinical specimens to both tumor Pt uptake and response. Patients with undetectable CTR1 expression in their tumors had significantly lower Pt concentration and reduced tumor response. Further evaluation with a larger sample size is required. (Supported by 2012 ASCO Young Investigator Award)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→