MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595571117

Proventricular Dilation Disease

2000· article· en· W2595571117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Helmer

Bibliographic record

VenueAFA Watchbird · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWastingPathologyEtiologyEnteropathyDiseaseGastroenterologyPhysiologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every aviculturist should be aware of the syndrome known as Proventricular Dilation Disease (PDD), Psittacine Wasting Disease, Macaw Wasting Syndrome, Neuropathic Gastric Dilation, or Blue and Gold Wasting Disease. This fatal disease was first reported in Blue and Gold Macaws in the late 1970s. Multiple causative agents, or etiologies, have been proposed. Most recently, a virus has been implicated; however, the identity of the virus has not been clearly established. The disease has been reported in more than 50 species of the order Psittaciformes, as well as suggestive findings in toucans, 'honey-creepers, canaries, weaver finches, Canada Geese, and Roseate Spoonbills. Research is ongoing at many institutions, including the Psittacine Disease Research Group, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia. The syndrome is characterized by inflammation of the nerves of the gastrointestinal tract. Two white blood cell types, plasma cells and lymphocytes, accumulate in the nervous system, especially the nerves that supply the muscles of the proventriculus, crop, ventriculus, and small intestine. The inflammation of these nerves inhibits normal muscle activity of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinical signs associated with this infiltration include depression, weight loss, constant or intermittent regurgitation, passage of undigested seeds in the feces, seizures, and abnormal head movements. Diagnosis can be difficult. Blood work is usually within normal parameters. Radiographs (X-rays), often using a contrast agent such as barium, may demonstrate an enlarged, or dilated, proventriculus. This dilation is normal in pre-weaning neonates, but suggests several syndromes, including PDD in adults. A second diagnostic test that may be used is a biopsy of the crop. A small piece of crop tissue is removed surgically to examine microscopically. The disease process, if present, may be identified in the nerves of the crop wall. This test is not perfect, and although a positive biopsy diagnoses PDD, a negative biopsy does not rule it out. Other diseases can mimic POD. In particular, heavy metal (lead or zinc) toxicity and paramyxovirus-3 infection resemble the disease. Microscopic analysis and blood tests are often the only way to differentiate these conditions. Proventricular dilation disease can occur in any aviary despite excellent quarantine, hygiene, and husbandry conditions. Some aviaries will experience an outbreak of several cases at the same time, while others will have sporadic cases over a number of years. In some instances, a single bird in a breeding pair will die, and the mate remains unaffected years later. Many birds exposed directly or indirectly to an affected bird remain asymptomatic. Birds in direct contact with those affected (mates, siblings, offspring) should be considered at higher risk of developing the disease and they should be isolated. These exposed birds should not be euthanized as many birds directly exposed to POD never develop symptoms. Birds that do show signs of disease are provided with highly digestible food in lowstress environments and can survive for months to years. Of course, any bird with the disease must be placed in strict isolation. In the aviary setting, every attempt should be made to diagnose the condition as early detection is beneficial to the flock. Although the causative agent remains unidentified, good quarantine and routine disinfectants are recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAFA WatchbirdSame topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207