Simone-simulation in medical oncology education: Part I—Pilot feasibility study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS6638 Background: Advances in medical oncology therapeutics have led to increasingly challenging cancer scenarios (CCS), including an expanding spectrum of treatment side effects and chronic cancer complications. There is no defined curriculum addressing CCS management. Simulation based training with debriefing (SBTD) is an educational method utilizing a virtual medium to mimic clinical scenarios. We hypothesize that SBTD, as an educational tool, is better than traditional didactic teaching of CCS management. This unique study tests the feasibility of high-fidelity SBTD in medical oncology education. We eventually aim to develop a national standardized oncology SBTD curriculum to train oncologists in CCS management Methods: With ethics approval, a curriculum highlighting CCS topics was created. Three clinical scenarios were developed and programmed using the high-fidelity SimMan mannequin. Scenarios last 10 minutes, and participants’ decisions determine the course of the scenario. Participants are recruited from medical oncology and internal medicine. After receiving the curriculum, participant demographics are collected and they are randomized 1:1 to intervention Arm A or B. Both arms perform three simulation scenarios. After scenario #1, all participants take a quiz testing CCS-relevant knowledge. Then, Arm A receives an expert-facilitated debriefing; Arm B receives a didactic lecture covering CCS management. The next day all participants perform simulation and quiz #2, with simulation and quiz #3 planned for 8 weeks later. Each simulation is videotaped for two independent reviewers to grade performance using the validated Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale. Beyond feasibility, outcomes include change in performance and quiz scores, and participants’ satisfaction with educational method as assessed by questionnaire after simulation #2-3. Differences between the three simulation scores in both arms will be calculated, and assessed using independent t-test. At this time, eleven participants have been enrolled and all participants have completed two simulations. Data will be analyzed after the third simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".