MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595636933

Climate-driven trends in the occurrence of major floods in North America and Europe

2014· preprint· en· W2595636933 on OpenAlexaff
Glenn A. Hodgkins, Paul H. Whitfield, Donald H. Burn, Jamie Hannaford, Benjamin Renard, Kerstin Stahl, Anne Fleig, Henrik Madsen, Luis Mediero, Johanna Korhonen, Craig Murphy, Pierre‐André Crochet, Donna Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceClimatologyClimate changeMeteorologyGeographyGeologyOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every year floods cause much damage around the world. It is important to understand historical changes in major floods to help inform how floods may change in the future. To date there is very limited evidence of past changes in major-flood magnitude and occurrence (floods exceeding 25, 50, and 100 year return-period thresholds). Many studies have analyzed annual-maximum flood trends (which primarily represent minor floods) and they have often not differentiated between trends influenced by human catchment alterations and those caused by climatic changes. Here we present an intercontinental assessment of historical climate-driven trends in major-flood occurrence using many diverse but minimally altered catchments. Based on our results, there is no compelling evidence for consistent changes over time in major-flood occurrence across North America and Europe. Flood occurrence, based on all 1206 gauges in our study, increased from 1961 to 2010 but not significantly, driven primarily by European increases; there was no change overall in the occurrence of major floods in North America (645 gauges). There were non-significant increases in flood occurrence from 1931 to 2010, based on all 322 longer-record gauges in our study, driven primarily by North American increases. There were significant increases from 1931-2010 in the occurrence of 25-year floods in North America but this appears to be driven by a relatively low occurrence of floods in the 1930s and 1940s. There were a few significant flood-occurrence increases and decreases for subgroups of gauges for both time periods, differentiated by catchment size, type of climate, flood threshold, and period of record. Past changes in major-flood occurrence are complex and future changes are also expected to be complex. International hydrologic networks containing minimally altered catchments will play an important role in understanding these complexities for both historical and future climatic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207