Long-Term Follow-Up of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) remains an option for patients with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL). Our program employs a strategy using allo-SCT for patients (pts) with high risk disease based on clinical characteristics and prior therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis to examine long-term disease control and treatment toxicity. Methods A total of 52 patients (pts) are included who underwent allo-SCT at our institution between Aug 1989 and Dec 2005. Patients were in a chemosensitive remission at the time of SCT. The conditioning regimen consisted of busulfan (1 mg/kg PO q6h X4 days between 1989–200 and 3.2 mg/kg IV daily X 4days subsequently) and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg X 2 days. Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg X 2 days and TBI 12 Gy was used for unrelated donor SCT. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) SCT were typically performed with Fludarabine 50 mg/m2 for 4 days and 2 Gy TBI. GVHD prophylaxis was with cyclosporine A and methotrexate. Results There were 34 males and 18 females. The median age at the time of transplant was 51 years (range 26 to 65). Histologic subtype was: CLL and/or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL); 48 and T-prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL): 4. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range 1 – 10) and was unavailable in 16. Prior chemotherapies included: anthracycline-based: 24, prior purine analog: 32, prior platinum-based: 8, prior auto-SCT: 1, prior rituximab: 5. The median time from diagnosis to allo-SCT was 58 months (range 5 – 260). 10 pts underwent RIC SCT. Graft source was: matched sibling (MSD) bone marrow (BM): 18, MSD peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC): 20, Mismatch related (MMRD) bone marrow (BM): 1, MRD PBSC: 4, matched unrelated donor (MUD) BM: 8, MUD PBSC: 1. At 5 years, the overall survival of the entire cohort is 51% (95% confidence intervals: 34 – 68%) with two long-term survivors of 14 and 17 years. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 20 of 52 pts (38%). 4 pts have relapsed ((8% of total cohort) and non-relapse mortality was 1 pt (2%). Overall survival by intensity of SCT conditioning regimen was not significant (p=0.3). TRM was similar in pts who received fully myeloablative SCT (40% vs. 20% in RICSCT group, p=0.29). Conclusions Acceptable survival post-SCT is possible using an allo-SCT strategy in CLL. However, TRM remains high in this group of heavily pre-treated patients with a median age of over 50 that predominantly received fully myeloablative allo-SCT. Due to small sample size, the potential benefit of reduced TRM with RICSCT cannot be demonstrated. Ideally, allo-SCT should be considered earlier in the course of the disease based on risk stratification utilizing traditional risk factors and modern prognostic factors such as FISH studies and novel markers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".