MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595717646

Sharing the Benefits of Tourism: A Case Study in Hainan, China

2005· article· en· W2595717646 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Wang, Geoffrey Wall

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPolitical scienceTourismContext (archaeology)EmpowermentPublic participationPoliticsEconomic growthHumanitiesGeographyPublic relationsEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public participation has long been recognized as a tool for balancing power in decision making and to spread the benefits of development projects. However, empowerment is a long-term and continuing process. In a top-down development context such as China, the sharing of benefits is likely to precede involvement in decision making. This paper reports a case study of community displacement as a result of tourism development in Hainan Province, China. It illustrates the encouraging process whereby the resettled villagers prepared for participation and became involved in the surrounding tourism development. The productive energies and creative talents which had been previously bottled up by minority cultures and traditions were opened up after the move, and the villagers began to demonstrate enhanced desires and abilities to share in the benefits of tourism. The paper demonstrates that they are able to articulate their needs and desires, if given the opportunity. However, it is hard for the minority Li villagers to participate and achieve significant benefits with their own efforts alone. Outside political, financial and technical help is required if they are to move up the participation spiral. La participation publique a longtemps ete reconnue comme un outil pour equilibrer le pouvoir dans le processus de prise de decision et pour repartir les avantages des projets de developpement. Cependant, le renforcement du pouvoir est un processus a long terme et continu. Dans un contexte de gestion hierarchique du developpement comme on le retrouve en Chine, le partage des avantages est susceptible de venir avant la participation au processus de decision. On presente dans ce rapport une etude de cas sur le deplacement d’une collectivite en raison du developpement touristique dans la province de Hainan, en Chine. On souligne le processus encourageant par lequel les villageois reinstalles se sont prepares a la participation et ont pris part au developpement du tourisme environnant. Les energies productives et les talents createurs qui avaient auparavant ete bâillonnes en raison du caractere minoritaire de cette culture et des traditions ont enfin ete liberes, et les villageois ont commence a faire preuve de leurs habiletes et de leurs desirs grandissants de retirer certains avantages du tourisme. On demontre dans cet article qu’ils etaient en mesure d’articuler leurs besoins et leurs desirs, si on leur en laissait l’occasion. Toutefois, il est difficile pour les villageois de la minorite Li de retirer des avantages significatifs par leurs seuls efforts. Hormis l’aide politique, une aide financiere et technique est donc necessaire afin qu’ils puissent gravir des echelons en matiere de participation aux avantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207