MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595868126 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201601180

Structure of the Central Atlantic Conjugate Passive Margins and their Associated Sedimentary Basins

2016· article· en· W2595868126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frauke Klingelhoëfer, Y. Biari, M. Benabdellouahed, Daniel Aslanian, M. Sahabi, Michael Schnabel, Thomas Funck, Luís Matias, Marc‐André Gutscher, C. Reichert, James A. Austin

Bibliographic record

Venue78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyContinental marginContinental crustOceanic crustPassive marginCrustRiftPaleontologyOceanic basinContinental shelfSeismologyStructural basinSubductionTectonicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Deep seismic data represent a key to understand the geometry and mechanism of continental rifting. The Central Atlantic conjugate passive continental margins pair is one of the oldest on earth, formed during the Upper Triassic–Lower Liassic. We present wide-angle and reflection seismic data from two study regions along this margin. Along the NW-African the thickness of unthinned continental crust decreases from 36 km in the North to about 27 km in the South. Crustal thinning takes place over a region of 150 km in the north and only 70 km in the south. The ocean-continent transition zone shows a variable width between 40 and 70 km and is characterised by seismic velocities in between those of typical oceanic and thinned continental crust. The neighbouring oceanic crust is characterised by a thickness of 7–8 km along the complete margin. Comparison to the conjugate margin off Nova Scotia shows comparable continental crustal structures, however 2–3 km thinner oceanic crust on the American side than on the African margin. Comparison to the Gulf of Lions – Sardinian margin pair shows symmetric structures comparable to those of the NE-Canadian – NW - African margin pair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207