MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596278211 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/83.s1.595

Regulation of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Bovine Granulosa Cells and Its Involvement in Follicular Dominance.

2010· article· en· W2596278211 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gustavo Zamberlam, Valerio Portelaj, João Francisco Coelho de Oliveira, Paulo Bayard Dias Gonçalves, Christopher A. Price

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyFollicular phaseParacrine signallingThecaGranulosa cellNitric oxide synthaseNitric oxideInternal medicineEndocrinologyFollicular fluidGene expressionMessenger RNAOvarian follicleCell biologyAndrologyGeneOocyteReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the paracrine events that regulate fertility in the cow is necessary not only because of the agricultural importance of this species, but also its potential use as a model for humans. Nitric oxide (NO), a free-radical gas, has been implicated in follicular growth in rodents, but the cow is an intriguing enigma: NO is produced by bovine granulosa cells and is regulated by FSH, but the enzymes responsible are reported to be absent. Three genes encode NO synthase proteins, one of which - iNOS - is widely considered to be regulated by extracellular ligands. We hypothesize that granulosa cells express the gene encoding iNOS, and that the expression of this gene is under hormonal regulation. The objectives of the present study were to determine the abundance of iNOS mRNA in growing and non-growing follicles in cattle, to determine the regulation of iNOS expression by FSH and growth factors, and to determine the action of NOS in bovine granulosa cells. The two largest follicles on days 1 to 5 of the first follicular wave of the cycle were collected from each pair of ovaries from six cows. Messenger RNA encoding iNOS was detected in granulosa and theca cells of bovine follicles by real-time PCR. The granulosa cells of dominant follicles contained higher levels of mRNA for iNOS compared with subordinate follicles (P<0.01). The regulation of iNOS expression was evaluated in a serum-free granulosa cell culture system. FSH (P<0.05) and IGF1 (P<0.01) stimulated E2 secretion iNOS mRNA abundance in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, both FGF2 and EGF (P<0.01) decreased iNOS expression and E2 secretion in FSH and in IGF1-treated cells. Owing to the parallel changes in estradiol secretion and iNOS mRNA, we assessed the role of estradiol in the regulation of iNOS mRNA; replacement of estrogen precursor with a non-aromatizable androgen (DHT) or the addition of an estrogen receptor antagonist inhibited FSH-stimulated iNOS mRNA abundance, and addition of E2 alone stimulated NO production in vitro. To assess the role of endogenous iNOS, cells were treated with an iNOS-selective inhibitor, which resulted in increased FasL mRNA levels (P<0.01), induction of caspase-3 activation (P<0.01) and an increase in the incidence of cell death (P<0.05). In conclusion, bovine graulosa cells express iNOS, and increased iNOS mRNA levels are associated with growth of the dominant follicle. Gonadotropic factors stimulate iNOS mRNA levels through increased E2 secretion, and physiological levels of NOS activity may contribute to growth and survival of granulosa cells. Supported by NSERC Canada and CNPq Brazil. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207