MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596486877 · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.630

A multi-centre phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and trastuzumab in HER-2 over-expressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2004· article· en· W2596486877 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. Chia, M. Clemons, Lee Ann Martin, A. Rodgers, Karen A. Gelmon, L. Panasci

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMetastatic breast cancerAnthracyclineTrastuzumabEjection fractionCardiotoxicityDoxorubicinInternal medicineBreast cancerCancerHeart failureOncologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

630 Background: Although combination therapy with conventional doxorubicin and trastuzumab (H) improves clinical outcome in HER-2 + MBC, a 27% cardiac dysfunction rate prevents clinical use of this combination. In a large phase III trial in MBC, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD:Caelyx®) was equally efficacious as conventional doxorubicin, but with significantly less cardiotoxicity. As well, the combination of PLD and H are synergistic in multiple breast cancer cell lines. With this rationale we performed a phase II trial of the combination of PLD and H as 1st line therapy in HER-2 + MBC, with cardiac safety as the primary end-point. Methods: Patients with measurable HER-2 + (IHC3+ or FISH positive) MBC were treated with PLD at 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks and H at a 4 mg/kg loading then 2 mg/kg weekly. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed by MUGA at baseline and after every 2nd cycle. Prior adjuvant anthracycline exposure was allowed. Cardiac toxicity was defined as either a LVEF decline ≥ 15% regardless of absolute value; decline ≤ 10% with absolute LVEF < 45%; or symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF). Results: 30 patients were enrolled from Aug 01 –Sept 03 from 4 Canadian centres. The median age was 59 years (31–75 years). 83% of the patients had visceral metastases, 64% had ER+ tumours and 41% had received prior adjuvant anthracyclines. A median of 5 cycles of PLD has been delivered so far (range 1–9). The mean LVEF at baseline, following cycles 2 and 4 were 63%, 59% and 60% respectively. A total of 3 patients experienced protocol-defined cardiotoxicity. No patient experienced symptomatic CHF. 27% of patients experienced grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The response rate (RR) for the evaluable cohort (n=29) was 55%. Within the 17 patients with no prior anthracycline exposure the RR was 65%. Median TTP and OS have not yet been reached. Conclusions: The combination of PLD and H is an active combination as 1st line therapy in HER-2 over-expressing MBC, with limited cardiotoxicity. This promising combination warrants further evaluation in the treatment of HER-2 over-expressing breast cancer. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Schering Canada Schering Canada Schering Canada Hoffmann LaRoche; Schering-Plough

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207