MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Two Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies (Candidate Biosimilar DRL-Rituximab and Innovator Reference Product Rituximab (Mabthera®) in a Randomised, Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study of CHOP with Rituximab Chemotherapy in Patients with CD20-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2016· article· en· W2596496142 on OpenAlexaff
Auro Viswabandya, Asis Mukhopadhyay, Sandip Shah, Rajnish Nagarkar, Sonica Sachdeva Batra, Luis López Lázaro, Suresh Kankanwadi, Alok Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRituximabMedicinePharmacodynamicsCmaxBiosimilarInternal medicinePharmacokineticsPrednisonePharmacologyEuropean unionCHOPCyclophosphamideVincristineGastroenterologyOncologyLymphomaChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: DRL-Rituximab (T) is a proposed biosimilar of rituximab. The similarity of DRL-Rituximab andtheinnovator reference products(USA: Rituxan®; European Union: Mabthera® [R]) has been demonstrated in physicochemical analyses and nonclinical studies. This study was undertaken to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of T with R sourced from the European Union. Methods: Multiple-center, randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group study conducted in patients of both genders, aged 18-60 with a centrally confirmed newly diagnosed CD20 positive diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in their first line of treatment. Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of 21 days either T or R at an initial dose of 375 mg/m2 along with chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone/prednisolone (CHOP). The primary objective of this study was to compare the PK of T and R. One of the secondary objectives was to establish the similarity of T and R in the pharmacodynamic parameters - as B-cell depletion and repletion in peripheral blood using counts of CD19+ positive cells determined by flow cytometry. The PK similarity criterion was that the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric mean ratios of AUC0-21days, and Cmax in Cycle 1 were within 80.00% - 125.00%. Cycle 1 PK, PD and summary safety results are reported here. Other PK parameters were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 151 patients were randomized to the study (76 to T, 75 to R). After exclusion of 2 patients with very low exposure (results confirmed to be outliers by a z-score higher than 3 and currently under further investigation), both products met the preset Cycle 1 PK similarity criterion (Table 1), with these 2 patients included the Cmax criterion was met, but for AUC the lower limit of the CI was 78.36% (Table 2). PK parameter values were generally comparable (Table 3). For PD both products appear comparable regarding both B-cell depletion and B-cell repletion, both in terms of proportion of patients as well as median time to depletion/repletion. (Table 4 & Figures 1A and 1B) Safety was also comparable between both products. Grade 3/4 Adverse Events (AEs) showed a similar trend in incidence across the two treatment arms [overall: 121 (80.1%); T: 57 (75.0%); R: 64 (85.3%)]. Neutropenia was the most frequently reported of the grade 3/4 AEs, followed by febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, and anaemia. The most commonly reported TEAEs related to the study drug were neutropenia [overall: 48 (31.8%); T: 29 (38.2%); R: 19 (25.3%)] and leukopenia [overall: 24 (15.9%); T: 16 (21.1%); R: 8 (10.7%)]. A total of 5 deaths are reported in the study amounting to 3.3% fatality rate. Conclusion: DRL-rituximab has equivalent PK profile to Mabthera in Cycle 1 when given in combination with standard CHOP chemotherapy for the treatment of CD20 positive DLBCL. PD and safety results are also similar. While awaiting results of further PK/PD data as well as outcomes from this trial, these results are highly encouraging and provide further impetus to development of DRL-rituximab as a candidate rituximab biosimilar. Acknowledgment: We thank all the Principal Investigators for their participation in conducting this study: Dr. Randeep Singh, Dr. Chiramana Haritha, Dr. Asis Mukhopadhyay, Dr. Anup Majumdar, Dr. Shailesh Bondarde, Dr. Rajnish Vasant Nagarkar, Dr. Vijay Ramanan, Dr. Chetan Dilip Deshmukh, Dr. MVT Krishna Mohan, Dr. SVSS Prasad, Dr. Nalini Kilara, Dr. Poonam Patil, Dr. Shekhar Patil, Dr. Neelesh Reddy, Dr. Suresh Sudalaiandi, Dr. Krishnan Srinivasan, Dr. Sundar Subramanian, Dr. VP Gangadharan, Dr. Auro Viswabandya, Dr. Alok Srivastava, Dr. Sharat Damodar, Dr. Rajesh Grover, Dr. Reena Nair, Dr. Bhausaheb Bagal, Dr. Kasi Viswanathan, Dr. Minish Jain, Dr. Jitendra Singh, Dr. Dipti Samanta, Dr. Sudha Sinha, Dr. Lakshmaiah Kuntegowdanahalli, Dr. Rajendersingh Arora, Dr. Sandip Shah, Dr. Shashikant Janardhan Apte, Dr. Mukul Goyal, and Dr. Prasanth Ganeshan. Disclosures Batra: Dr. Reddy's Labs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lazaro:Dr. Reddy's Labs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kankanwadi:Dr. Reddy's Labs: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsFrench-language works237,207