MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596503981

Court Awards as a Catalyst for Conservation

2016· article· en· W2596503981 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Springinotic

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessLawPolitical sciencePublic administration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Judiciary in British Columbia has a number of options in sentencing violators of environmental laws. In addition to fines and out of court settlements, many statutes now provide innovative opportunities for creative sentencing. One option for creative sentencing is the payment of money to a trust fund with conservation goals for certain projects or actions for the public good. The Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation (HCTF) is a not-for-profit charitable foundation whose mission is to invest in projects that maintain and enhance the health and biodiversity of British Columbia’s fish, wildlife, and habitats. HCTF has been the beneficiary of most of these creative sentencing court awards. In 2007, an accidental breach of an oil pipeline in Burnaby released 250,000 litres of oil into the environment, including about 70,000 litres into Burrard Inlet. Following cleanup and remediation by industry, three parties to the accident were convicted and required to pay $447,000 to HCTF under creative sentencing provisions. Located adjacent to downtown Vancouver and forming its primary port area, Burrard Inlet has been severely degraded due to urbanization and industrialization. Over the past century, the estuaries on Burrard Inlet have lost 95% of their habitat values and their biodiversity. Recognizing this, HCTF used the creative sentencing payment to initiate a pilot program that would: 1) restore and enhance estuarine, intertidal and near shore riparian habitats in and around Burrard Inlet; 2) attract additional investment partners by requiring a 3:1 funding match; and 3) improve public awareness of the benefits of estuaries and creative sentencing as a tool for conservation. To date, estuary restoration and enhancement projects have been initiated and/or completed at six sites, including MacKay Creek, Seymour River and Mosquito Creek. The 3:1 leveraging ratio has been exceeded and investment partners include BCIT, the City of North Vancouver, District of North Vancouver, Metro Vancouver, Squamish Nation, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Royal Bank of Canada, North Shore Fish & Game Club, and Living Rivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207