MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596617320 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/87.s1.507

Study of Gene Expression in Bovine Granulosa Cells from Different Follicle Growth Phases.

2012· article· en· W2596617320 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gabriel Douville, Marc‐André Sirard

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyFolliculogenesisTranscriptomeFollicleReproductive technologyOocyteAromataseAndrologyOvarian follicleDNA microarrayAntral follicleGene expressionGeneCell biologyEndocrinologyGeneticsFollicular phaseEmbryogenesisEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known that 1 in 3 follicles contains a good a competent oocyte, but to this day the features of those particular follicles have not been characterized. The objective of this study was to build the transcriptomic profile of granulosa cells (GC's) originating from pre-dominance follicle (6 to 9mm diameter) in dairy cattle using microarrays and validating by Q-PCR. Granulosas originating from three different phases of antral follicle growth were compared: growing (G), plateau (P) and atresia (A), as categorized by flow cytometry on DNA content. The growing and atretic conditions we're each hybridized against the plateau condition as a reference in order to understand the specific biological mechanisms underway in this class of follicles, which is believed to hold oocytes with the best capacities to produce an offspring following in-vitro assisted reproduction technologies such as maturation (MIV) and fertilisation (FIV). 2,942 genes were differentially expressed (P<0.05) in G vs P and 1,974 in P vs A. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software was used to study the regulation pattern of genes and functions predicted to be enriched in the dataset. Cytometry was efficient in categorizing the follicles in the different phases, as determined by the down-regulation of steroidogenesis genes: cytochrome P450, subfamily XIX (CYP19A1, i.e. aromatase), hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 beta- and steroid delta-isomerase 1 (HSD3B1) and cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 (CYP11A1) in the granulosa cells of P follicles relative to G and probably in response to the decreasing FSH level. On the other hand, the P vs A contrast showed up-regulation of multiple transcripts associated to apoptosis: tissue transglutaminase (TGM2; transglutaminase 2 (C polypeptide, protein-glutamine-gamma-glutamyltransferase)), SH3 domain containing ring finger 1(SH3RF1, also known as POSH), disabled-2 (DAB2), desmoglein-2 (DSG2), death receptor 5 (DR5), caspase-4 (CASP4), Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 1 (RASSF1), chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 2 (beta) (CCT2) and interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5). Functions such as cell death, secretion of lipids and ploidy of cells, were predicted to be increased in P-follicle-granulosa compared to G-follicles, while functions such as growth of cells were predicted to be decreased in P relative to G. Although the genes more expressed in the A condition did not correspond to common atretic markers, they are likely to be indicators differentiating between the late atresia status of the follicle and early atresia, a hallmark characteristic of plateau follicles. This study offers multiple candidate genes to be further studied at a biochemical level in order to elucidate their role in the modulation of oocyte competence. This work was supported by NSERC of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207