Automated enumeration and size distribution analysis of Microcystis aeruginosa via fluorescence imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to climate change, toxic cyanobacteria and algae blooms and the associated exposure risk to humans has become a global issue. As a result, routine monitoring to evaluate cell concentrations is increasingly required to ensure safe water supplies. Current methods for cyanobacteria and algae cells enumeration are time consuming and cost-intensive due to the need for manual labor, which prevents their widespread adoption for routine water monitoring.. Automated enumeration with computer-assisted image analysis has strong potential to become a viable solution for continuous routine monitoring; however, the design of such automated systems is challenging due to: a) poor contrast between the target cells and the background, b) presence of confounding cells and abiotic particles and b) image quality variability depending on factors such as the underlying microscopy system in use and the sample condition. In this study, we introduce a novel integrated imaging-based method for automated enumeration and size distribution of Microcystis aeruginosa, a species of freshwater cyanobacteria that can originate harmful blooms. The target cells were excited using a 546nm light source and the resulting fluorescent imaging signal was acquired. A probabilistic unsupervised classification approach was taken to detect Microcystis cells from the surrounding background based on the fluorescent signal. A Gaussian mixture model was learned from the fluorescent imaging signal. The detected Microcystis cells were then enumerated and statistics regarding their size distribution automatically computed. When compared to the manual enumeration data using an hemacytometer, the developed method achieved higher accuracy using much less time and resources, without cell staining. These preliminary results demonstrate the potential of the proposed method as a powerful and robust tool for water quality monitoring and safe water quality control when used alongside gold standard methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".