ESTRATEGIA EDUCATIVA Y CAPACIDAD DE AUTOCUIDADO EN PERSONAS CON DIABETES MELLITUS TIPO 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduccion: en el mundo hay cerca de 347 millones de personas con diabetes, la OMS preve se convierta para el 2030 en la septima causa mundial de muerte; senala que cada 10 segundos una persona muere por causas relacionadas a la diabetes, en Mexico es la primera causa de muerte entre las mujeres y la segunda entre los hombres. Objetivo: Determinar la estrategia educativa y la capacidad de autocuidado de la persona con Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Materiales: estudio descriptivo, longitudinal, participaron pacientes con DM tipo 2 de la Comunidad Canada de Bustos, se aplico la Escala de capacidad de autocuidado y un cuestionario sobre conocimientos. Resultados: participaron 36 pacientes, 28(77.7%) de la comunidad Canada de Bustos y 8(22.2%) del Capulin, rango de edad 26-63 anos, con una buena (58.3%) capacidad de autocuidado. Discusion: La DM es un problema de salud publica a nivel mundial, la implementacion de tecnicas educativas son una herramienta a favor de la salud general y oral para mejorar la calidad de vida. Conclusion: Es necesaria la implementacion de campanas educativas debido a que los pacientes no tienen conocimiento respecto a las complicaciones que puede generar la enfermedad y que pueden poner en riesgo su vida.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".