MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596719579 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03737

Development of Chemical Isotope Labeling LC-MS for Milk Metabolomics: Comprehensive and Quantitative Profiling of the Amine/Phenol Submetabolome

2017· article· en· W2596719579 on OpenAlexafffund
Dorothea Mung, Liang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesGenome Canada
KeywordsChemistryMetabolomeMetabolomicsChromatographyMass spectrometryLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Milk is a complex sample containing a variety of proteins, lipids, and metabolites. Studying the milk metabolome represents an important application of metabolomics in the general area of nutritional research. However, comprehensive and quantitative analysis of milk metabolites is a challenging task due to the wide range of variations in chemical/physical properties and concentrations of these metabolites. We report an analytical workflow for in-depth profiling of the milk metabolome based on chemical isotope labeling (CIL) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with a focus of using dansylation labeling to target the amine/phenol submetabolome. An optimal sample preparation method, including the use of methanol at a 3:1 ratio of solvent to milk for protein precipitation and dichloromethane for lipid removal, was developed to detect and quantify as many metabolites as possible. This workflow was found to be generally applicable to profile milk metabolomes of different species (cow, goat, and human) and types. Results from experimental replicate analysis ( n = 5) of 1:1, 2:1, and 1:2 12 C-/ 13 C-labeled cow milk samples showed that 95.7%, 94.3%, and 93.2% of peak pairs, respectively, had ratio values within ±50% accuracy range and 90.7%, 92.6%, and 90.8% peak pairs had RSD values of less than 20%. In the metabolomic analysis of 36 samples from different categories of cow milk (brands, batches, and fat percentages) with experimental triplicates, a total of 7104 peak pairs or metabolites could be detected with an average of 4573 ± 505 ( n = 108) pairs detected per LC-MS run. Among them, 3820 peak pairs were commonly detected in over 80% of the samples with 70 metabolites positively identified by mass and retention time matches to the dansyl standard library and 2988 pairs with their masses matched to the human metabolome libraries. This unprecedentedly high coverage of the amine/phenol submetabolome illustrates the complexity of the milk metabolome. Since milk and milk products are consumed in large quantities on a daily basis, the intake of these milk metabolites even at low concentrations can be cumulatively high. The high-coverage analysis of the milk metabolome using CIL LC-MS should be very useful in future research involving the study of the effects of these metabolites on human health. It should also be useful in the dairy industry in areas such as improving milk production, developing new processing technologies, developing improved nutritional products, quality control, and milk product authentication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207