Member characteristics and engagement in an e and m-health physical activity promotion program: Uwalk alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UWALK is a multi-strategy, community-wide, e and m-Health physical activity promotion program in Alberta, Canada. Funding for the program commenced in February 2013 and finished on March 31, 2016. The official launch, including the launching the UWALK website took place on September 20, 2013. The purpose of this presentation is to provide a descriptive overview of UWALK member demographics and engagement with UWALK website features. At the completion of the funding period, the UWALK website accumulated a total of 16,061 registered members who logged a cumulative total of 5,230,677,746 steps. Of the UWALK registered members 10,242 met the criteria to be included in the current analysis. The average age of members was 45 (SD 13) years old, the majority of which were female (79%). Among active website users (n = 6,992) participants logged steps an average of 62 (SD 104) days and logged an average of 8,700 (SD 5,371) steps per logged day. Additionally, 74% participated in one or more interactive challenges, 69% were a member of a community, 32% were a member of a team and 13% added another member as online 'friend' on the UWALK website. Finally, a small number of members (n = 822) synchronised and automatically uploaded activity data from electronic activity monitors to their UWALK profile. Modest engagement with the website was achieved, however future research should further explore website usability and users preferences. Overall, UWALK has demonstrated promising potential for population level dissemination, as initial evidence suggests the program can provide a wide reach. Acknowledgments: Alberta Centre for Active Living
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".