La reproduction familiale en Nouvelle-France ( xvii e - xix e siècles)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, un régime successoral égalitaire cède progressivement la place à un régime inégalitaire. Ce mouvement se produit à la faveur d’un renversement complet du régime d’autorité au sein de la famille et au prix d’une trahison, tant de la lettre que de l’esprit de la coutume. De nouveaux usages prennent leur essor à mesure que les parents se détachent des modèles apportés du vieux continent et que des exigences de « confort » ont le loisir de se manifester. Les biens ne sont plus transmis à tous les enfants, comme en France, mais à un seul. À un régime d’autorité coutumier, privant les individus du droit de disposer de leurs biens, a été substitué un régime d’autorité libéral, prenant appui sur les donations. C’est ce renversement qu’il s’agit d’expliquer et de décrire ici, à la lumière de l’historiographie québequoise et des travaux réalisés sur la coutume de Paris.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".