Keine Angst vor großen Räumen. Der Blick nach Brasilien als Hoffnungsschimmer in der pastoralen Krise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Begünstigt durch ein neues Kirchenbild des 2. Vatikanischen Konzils und von verschiedenen soziologischen Faktoren wie dem Priestermangel, der Komplexität der kirchlichen Präsenz in einer modernen Gesellschaft und dem Entstehen der Basisgemeinden unterstützt, entstanden besonders von Beginn der 60er Jahre an neue Formen von Dienstämtern in der brasilianischen Kirche. Diese neuen ministérios entstanden und entstehen nicht durch Zufall. Sie sind eine kirchliche Antwort auf die verschiedensten pastoralen Herausforderungen der Zeit. In the 1960s when Vatican II introduced new models for being church, new forms of ministries arose in the Brazilian Church. This development strengthened by diverse sociological factors such as the lack of priests, the complexity of the presence of the church in modern society, and the emergence of basic ecclesial communities. The new ministérios did not come into existence by accident. They are the church’s answer to the different contemporary pastoral challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".