MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of two BRM promoter variants on the risk of stage I/II upper aerodigestive tract cancers.

2012· article· en· W2596950809 on OpenAlexaff
Kit Man Wong, Xiaoping Qiu, Dangxiao Cheng, Abul Kalam Azad, Prakruthi R. Palepu, Maryam Mirshams, Devalben Patel, Zhuo Chen, Heidi Roberts, Jennifer J. Knox, Rebecca Wong, Gail Darling, John Waldron, David P. Goldstein, Natasha B. Leighl, Frances A. Shepherd, Ming‐Sound Tsao, Sandy Der, David Reisman, Geoffrey Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMalignancyLung cancerCancer researchOncologyInternal medicineOdds ratioCarcinogenesisCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10522 Background: BRM is a key subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF and a putative tumor suppressor gene that is silenced in 15-20% of many solid tumors (PMID 15722796). Evidence suggests that it is epigenetically regulated, as two BRM promoter insertion variants (BRM-741 and BRM-1321) may lead to gene silencing by recruiting histone deacetylases. The presence of both homozygous BRM-741 and BRM-1321 highly correlate with loss of BRM expression and function in lung tumors, while increasing smoking-related lung cancer by two-fold (PMID 21478907). Also, the pharmacologic reversal of epigenetic changes of BRM offers a potential novel therapeutic approach (PMID 21478905). We assessed whether these BRM variants are associated with the risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers, focusing on Stage I/II tumors that would most benefit from new screening and prevention strategies. Methods: BRM was genotyped by qPCR using TaqMan probes. 1,008 controls were matched to 595 cases by frequency distribution based on age, gender and smoking status. Multivariate logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Results: The 595 cases were: 115 esophageal, 278 lung, and 202 head and neck cancers. 51% were adenocarcinomas; 60% were Stage I. The frequency of homozygozity was: BRM-741, 26%; BRM-1321, 23%; both variants, 15%. In the combined analysis, there was significant correlation between malignancy and homozygous BRM-741 (aOR 1.91 (95%CI 1.3-2.4); p=0.001) or BRM-1321 (aOR 1.94 (95%CI 1.4-2.7; p=3x10E-4). Being homozygous for both BRM variants carried an even greater risk (aOR 2.45 (95%CI 1.6-3.9); p=1x10E-5). This correlation was similar for adenocarcinomas (aOR 2.53 (95%CI 1.4-4.2); p=6x10E-4) and squamous cell carcinomas (aOR 2.33 (95%CI 1.3-4.4); p=8x10E-4). The increased cancer risk was also similar between these subgroups: head and neck, esophageal and lung cancers; Stage I and II patients; smokers and non-smokers. Conclusions: The two homozygous BRM variants increase the risk of early stage upper aerodigestive tumors by more than two-fold independent of smoking status. BRM promoter variants and their potential epigenetic effect may be early events in the evolution of these cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207