Bortezomib Consolidation after Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Leads to a High Incidence of Immunophenotypic Complete Response in Young and/or High-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Allogeneicstem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the only curative modality for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients (pts). However, we have previously shown in a large cohort of 92 pts that relapse remains common (49%) and the incidence/severity of chronic GVHD is significant (79%) after tandem auto-allo SCT in NDMM pts (Ahmad et al. BMT 2016;51:529). We hypothesized that a tandem auto-nonmyeloablative (NMA) alloSCT followed by bortezomib (btz) consolidation might be safe, while decreasing both the severity/incidence of chronic GVHD and the risk of relapse in young and/or high-risk NDMM pts. In addition, we hypothesized that btz might further increase depth of responses after alloSCT. Methods: NDMM pts with either ISS stage III, plasma cell leukemia, abnormal cytogenetics defined as t(4;14) with ISS II or III, t(14;16), t(14;20), 17p-, 1p-, or 1q+ in ≥ 10% of purified plasma cells or age ≤ 50 years with a 6/6 sibling or 8/8 unrelated donor were prospectively enrolled in this phase II trial. After a btz-based induction with ≥ partial response and autologous (A) SCT, outpatient NMA alloSCT was performed with either a conditioning of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 5 days and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 x 5 days (sibling donor) or fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 3 days and TBI 2Gy (unrelated donor), followed by G-CSF mobilized stem cells infusion. Acute GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Btz 1.3 mg/m2 SC every 2 weeks was started on day +120 after alloSCT for 1 year. Bone marrow aspirates before alloSCT, before starting btz and every 3 months thereafter were prospectively collected for 2 years in order to assess the impact of btz on minimal residual disease (MRD) by a highly sensitive (≥10-5) multiparametric flow cytometry using the 8-color Euroflow protocol evaluating ≥ 10 x 106 cells/specimen. MRD negativity was defined as the detection of < 30 clonal aberrant plasma cells. Response evaluation is based on IMWG criteria including immunophenotypic complete response (iCR) defined as a stringent CR (sCR) plus a negative MRD. Immunophenotypic remission (iR) is defined as MRD negativity regardless of other disease status. Results: As of 06/30/2016, 20 MM pts have been enrolled and 18 allotransplanted (8 siblings; 10 unrelated); median age is 54.5 (range 35-63) years. Of these pts we report: age ≤ 50 (n=6), ISS stage III (n=10) or poor risk cytogenetics (n=7; 5 with 1q+, 2 with t(4;14)). Pts received initial induction with VTD (n=7) or CyBorD (n=11), followed by ASCT (melphalan 200 mg/m2; median CD34+/kg infused: 7.2 x 106). Median times from diagnosis to ASCT and from ASCT to alloSCT were 7.0 (range: 5.3-11) and 4.8 (range: 3.0-7.0) months, respectively. All pts allotransplanted (median CD34+/kg infused: 7.4 x 106) engrafted. With a median follow-up of 282 (range: 22-562) days after alloSCT, 15 pts have received 221 of 239 (92%) planned doses of btz. Observed grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events include btz-induced diarrhea (n=1), herpes mucositis despite adequate prophylaxis (n=1), viral hemorrhagic cystitis (n=3) and asymptomatic EBV reactivation (n=4) requiring rituximab. In contrast, CMV reactivation was infrequent. None of the pts developed or exacerbated pre-existing peripheral neuropathies. Fifteen pts were followed ≥ 7 months after alloSCT; acute GVHD occurred in 3 pts (1 grade II; 2 grade III) and chronic in 10 (67%; 3 mild; 7 moderate). Two pts died from grade III acute GVHD. Nine pts (60%) required hospitalization for a median of 13 days (8-184). Response rates after induction, ASCT, alloSCT and btz are shown in Table 1. Most notably, depth of response improved after btz, with 6 pts (40%; 2 with 1q21, 1 with t(4;14), 2 normal and 1 unknown) in iCR and 4 pts (27%; 1 with 1q21, 2 normal and 1 unknown) in sCR. An additional 20% of pts not in iCR or sCR were in iR with negative MRD. No patient developed extramedullary disease. Conclusions: Our major finding is a high sCR + iCR of 67% in young and/or high-risk NDMM pts following tandem auto-alloSCT and btz consolidation. Although our follow-up is still short, our results are encouraging for an eventual low relapse rate. Additionally, administration of btz 1.3 mg/m2 SC every 2 weeks starting on day +120 after alloSCT is safe and well tolerated. Finally, close monitoring of EBV should be performed prospectively in alloSCT recipients who receive a proteasome inhibitor in order to better assess the risk of viral reactivation. Disclosures Sebag: Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".