MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Bortezomib Consolidation after Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Leads to a High Incidence of Immunophenotypic Complete Response in Young and/or High-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients

2016· article· en· W2597008783 on OpenAlexaff
Richard LeBlanc, Imran Ahmad, Rafik Terra, Séverine Landais, Michaël Sébag, Émilie Lemieux‐Blanchard, Nadia M. Bambace, Léa Bernard, Sandra Cohen, Jean‐Sébastien Delisle, Thomas Kiss, Silvy Lachance, Denis‐Claude Roy, Guy Sauvageau, Jean Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFludarabineTransplantationInternal medicineBortezomibCyclophosphamideMultiple myelomaGastroenterologySurgeryOncologyImmunologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneicstem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the only curative modality for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients (pts). However, we have previously shown in a large cohort of 92 pts that relapse remains common (49%) and the incidence/severity of chronic GVHD is significant (79%) after tandem auto-allo SCT in NDMM pts (Ahmad et al. BMT 2016;51:529). We hypothesized that a tandem auto-nonmyeloablative (NMA) alloSCT followed by bortezomib (btz) consolidation might be safe, while decreasing both the severity/incidence of chronic GVHD and the risk of relapse in young and/or high-risk NDMM pts. In addition, we hypothesized that btz might further increase depth of responses after alloSCT. Methods: NDMM pts with either ISS stage III, plasma cell leukemia, abnormal cytogenetics defined as t(4;14) with ISS II or III, t(14;16), t(14;20), 17p-, 1p-, or 1q+ in ≥ 10% of purified plasma cells or age ≤ 50 years with a 6/6 sibling or 8/8 unrelated donor were prospectively enrolled in this phase II trial. After a btz-based induction with ≥ partial response and autologous (A) SCT, outpatient NMA alloSCT was performed with either a conditioning of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 5 days and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 x 5 days (sibling donor) or fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 3 days and TBI 2Gy (unrelated donor), followed by G-CSF mobilized stem cells infusion. Acute GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Btz 1.3 mg/m2 SC every 2 weeks was started on day +120 after alloSCT for 1 year. Bone marrow aspirates before alloSCT, before starting btz and every 3 months thereafter were prospectively collected for 2 years in order to assess the impact of btz on minimal residual disease (MRD) by a highly sensitive (≥10-5) multiparametric flow cytometry using the 8-color Euroflow protocol evaluating ≥ 10 x 106 cells/specimen. MRD negativity was defined as the detection of < 30 clonal aberrant plasma cells. Response evaluation is based on IMWG criteria including immunophenotypic complete response (iCR) defined as a stringent CR (sCR) plus a negative MRD. Immunophenotypic remission (iR) is defined as MRD negativity regardless of other disease status. Results: As of 06/30/2016, 20 MM pts have been enrolled and 18 allotransplanted (8 siblings; 10 unrelated); median age is 54.5 (range 35-63) years. Of these pts we report: age ≤ 50 (n=6), ISS stage III (n=10) or poor risk cytogenetics (n=7; 5 with 1q+, 2 with t(4;14)). Pts received initial induction with VTD (n=7) or CyBorD (n=11), followed by ASCT (melphalan 200 mg/m2; median CD34+/kg infused: 7.2 x 106). Median times from diagnosis to ASCT and from ASCT to alloSCT were 7.0 (range: 5.3-11) and 4.8 (range: 3.0-7.0) months, respectively. All pts allotransplanted (median CD34+/kg infused: 7.4 x 106) engrafted. With a median follow-up of 282 (range: 22-562) days after alloSCT, 15 pts have received 221 of 239 (92%) planned doses of btz. Observed grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events include btz-induced diarrhea (n=1), herpes mucositis despite adequate prophylaxis (n=1), viral hemorrhagic cystitis (n=3) and asymptomatic EBV reactivation (n=4) requiring rituximab. In contrast, CMV reactivation was infrequent. None of the pts developed or exacerbated pre-existing peripheral neuropathies. Fifteen pts were followed ≥ 7 months after alloSCT; acute GVHD occurred in 3 pts (1 grade II; 2 grade III) and chronic in 10 (67%; 3 mild; 7 moderate). Two pts died from grade III acute GVHD. Nine pts (60%) required hospitalization for a median of 13 days (8-184). Response rates after induction, ASCT, alloSCT and btz are shown in Table 1. Most notably, depth of response improved after btz, with 6 pts (40%; 2 with 1q21, 1 with t(4;14), 2 normal and 1 unknown) in iCR and 4 pts (27%; 1 with 1q21, 2 normal and 1 unknown) in sCR. An additional 20% of pts not in iCR or sCR were in iR with negative MRD. No patient developed extramedullary disease. Conclusions: Our major finding is a high sCR + iCR of 67% in young and/or high-risk NDMM pts following tandem auto-alloSCT and btz consolidation. Although our follow-up is still short, our results are encouraging for an eventual low relapse rate. Additionally, administration of btz 1.3 mg/m2 SC every 2 weeks starting on day +120 after alloSCT is safe and well tolerated. Finally, close monitoring of EBV should be performed prospectively in alloSCT recipients who receive a proteasome inhibitor in order to better assess the risk of viral reactivation. Disclosures Sebag: Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→