MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597158558 · doi:10.1093/fs/knx056

<i>A Place in the Sun: Haiti, Haitians, and the Remaking of Quebec</i> . By S <scp>ean</scp>  M <scp>ills</scp> <i>A Place in the Sun: Haiti, Haitians, and the Remaking of Quebec</i> . By MillsSean. (Studies on the History of Quebec.) Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2016. xiv + 304 pp., ill.

2017· article· en· W2597158558 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darryl Leroux

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisappointmentPoliticsRacismCommissionSociologyGender studiesMedia studiesHistoryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Without a doubt, readers of French Studies who work on Québécois history will find much in Sean Mills’s new book to inform their thinking. His lucid prose establishes the crucial contribution of Haitian activists, intellectuals, and/or workers to the burgeoning social upheaval in post-Second World War Quebec, notably in 1960s−80s Montreal. In particular, Mills ensures that the flurry of Haitian organizations, campaigns, and movements that engaged diasporic Haitians and Québécois people alike are front and centre. For instance, Mills is at his strongest when detailing the political work of the Maison d’Haïti and various associated anti-racist, feminist groups, as well as the work of the Collectif des chauffeurs de taxi noirs du centre-ville, whose high-profile activism against racism in the taxi industry led to the Quebec Human Rights Commission’s first-ever public hearing in 1983. Nevertheless, the near-complete erasure of the long, entangled history of the two former French colonies is a notable disappointment. Despite gesturing towards an analysis of the ‘afterlives’ of slavery in Quebec — in keeping with the work of Saidiya Hartman (for example, Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux)) — readers could reasonably conclude that relations between Quebec and Haiti only began in earnest around the Second World War. Yet, Quebec’s memorial and cartographic landscapes suggest otherwise. As we know, many of the enslaved Africans in New France had previously toiled in Saint-Domingue, while several of its vaunted administrators — whose names now adorn cities, towns, streets, parks, and monuments in Quebec — were intimately involved in the administration of Saint-Domingue, among some of France’s other slave colonies. Beside these more evident connections, trade between New France and Saint-Domingue was a prominent and still-growing phenomenon of economic and social life halted only by the British Conquest. Any analysis of the ‘afterlives’ of slavery must graft the regime of terror in the French Atlantic onto the subsequent organization of anti-blackness and racial violence across the region. How do centuries-old imperial relations lead to the migration of Haitians to Quebec in the late twentieth century? To answer such a question, we would likely consider how Duvalier’s rise to power was linked to the debilitating century-long ‘independence’ debt forced onto Haiti by France and its allies in 1825 and the eventual adoption of ‘structural adjustment’ policies in the latter part of the twentieth century, which depopulated the countryside and created an urban underclass rife for economic subjugation in the global economy. Instead of considering these continuities, Mills constructs a historical narrative that largely erases the less salutary history of French/Québécois (settler) involvement in racial violence. My concern, then, is that one could read this book and conclude that Haiti is naturally chaotic — a trope that is all too common in the West. Mills could have avoided these pitfalls by adopting a much broader French Atlantic perspective that contests dominant national evocations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0120.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207