MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597188266 · doi:10.1093/fs/knx055

<i>Political Belief in France, 1927–1945: Gender, Empire and Fascism in the Croix de feu and Parti social français</i> . By C <scp>aroline</scp>  C <scp>ampbell</scp> <i>Political Belief in France, 1927–1945: Gender, Empire and Fascism in the Croix de feu and Parti social français</i> . By CampbellCaroline. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press: 2015. xiv + 286 pp., ill.

2017· article· en· W2597188266 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom Beaumont

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpirePoliticsPower (physics)Gender studiesWelfareHistorySociologyPolitical scienceEconomic historyHumanitiesEthnologyLawAncient historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the first monograph study of the role of women within the Croix de feu/Parti social français (PSF), Caroline Campbell makes an important contribution to the field. Extending the analysis beyond the boundaries of the metropole to incorporate the organization’s development in France’s North African empire, Campbell’s analysis engages with a wide range of themes. In addition to an in-depth analysis of the significant role played by women acting within France’s largest far-right organization, Campbell also provides important insights into the history of empire, gender, and social welfare in late Third Republic and Vichy France. Founded in 1927 as a political movement for war veterans, the Croix de feu/PSF was transformed from March 1934 onwards by a major growth in female membership. This was a process that reduced male veterans’ membership in the organization to just a third of the overall total. From 1934 until the Vichy period, some 300,000 women joined the Croix de feu/PSF, a level of women’s participation that, Campbell underlines, was ‘unprecedented in a mixed-sex political movement’ (p. 22). Alongside this considerable influx of female members emerged a formidable social welfare programme dominated by middle-class women, which quickly came to play a central role in the Croix de feu/PSF’s platform. Indeed, so significant was this transformation from the mid-1930s that Campbell identifies it as a ‘fundamental redefinition of the movement’s path to power’ (p. 49). The strategic shift within the Croix de feu/PSF from paramilitarism to social action is one that has already been explored by scholars, notably Laura Lee Downs (‘“And So We Transform a People”: Women’s Social Action and the Reconfiguration of Politics on the Right in France, 1934–1947’, Past and Present, 225 (2014), 187–225), Sean Kennedy (Reconciling France Against Democracy: The Croix de feu and the Parti social français, 1927–1945 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press: 2007)), and Kevin Passmore (‘“Planting the Tricolor in the Citadels of Communism”: Women’s Social Action in the Croix de feu and Parti social français’, Journal of Modern History, 71 (1999), 814–51). Among Campbell’s important contributions in this work, however, is her emphasis on the signal role of women in effecting this change, both in the leadership and at the grass-roots level of the organization. Stressing the agency and autonomy that women gained within the metropolitan movement, Campbell demonstrates how middle-class Catholic women were able to find within the Croix de feu/PSF’s ‘Social First!’ programme a space for independent action largely denied them within 1930s France. Such agency was in large part absent from the colonial Croix de feu/PSF. Here, as Campbell effectively demonstrates, a hyper-masculine and violent colonial setting marginalized women, thereby severely curtailing any equivalent development of a social action programme which had proved so successful in extending the movement’s appeal within metropolitan France. Thus, argues Campbell, the metropolitan and North African movements moved apart decisively through the 1930s and 1940s. While the French sections became increasingly feminized (a process that accelerated under Vichy) and embraced social action, in the Maghreb political violence and paramilitarism only intensified. A richly documented and wide-ranging study, Campbell’s book will appeal broadly to scholars across a number of fields. The author makes significant contributions to the history of gender and of the far right in France and the empire, and to debates regarding social action and reform during the final years of the Third Republic and under Vichy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207