MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597250768

Influence of Isometric Exercise Training on Quadriceps Muscle Architecture and Strength in Obese Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis

2017· article· en· W2597250768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Waleed S. Mahmoud, Ragab K. Elnaggar, Ahmed Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseMedicineOsteoarthritisWOMACPhysical therapyKnee painKnee JointRehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obese individuals have reduced quadriceps muscle strength relative to body mass that may increase the rate of \nprogression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of isometric exercise \ntraining on quadriceps muscle architecture and strength in obese subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Fortyfour \nobese male subjects aged 40–65 years diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned into group A \n(n=32) and group B (n=12). Group A subjects performed a 12-week isometric exercise program. Group B subjects \ndid not participate in any exercise program and maintained their ordinary activities for the same period. Both groups \nreceived the same conventional physical therapy program including hot packs and therapeutic ultrasonic. Muscle \nthickness, pennation angles and fascicle length of the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle of the affected knee were measured \nat rest by B-mode ultrasonography. Maximal voluntary isometric knee extension torque (MVIC) of the affected \nknee was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer. Knee pain and function were evaluated using visual analogue \npain scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). All variables were \nevaluated before and the end of the intervention period for both groups. Results: at the end of the program, group A \nsubjects showed significant improvements compared with group B subjects regarding MVIC and muscle architecture \nparameters (p<0.05). Also, there was significant improvement in post-test VAS and WOMAC scores in group A \nsubjects compared to group B subjects (p<0.05). Conclusion: A 12-week quadriceps isometric training program \nimproves knee pain and quadriceps muscle strength and architecture in obese subjects with knee OA. These results \nindicate that isometric training should be regarded as a proper exercise intervention for obese patients with knee OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207