MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597361235

Influence of Spontaneous Emission on a Single-State Atom Interferometer

2008· article· en· W2597361235 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Beattie, B. Barrett, M. Weel, I. Chan, C. Mok, S. B. Cahn, A. Kumarakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the American Physical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtom interferometerPhysicsInterferometryExcited stateAtomic physicsExcitationAmplitudeInterference (communication)Atom (system on chip)SIGNAL (programming language)Spontaneous emissionEcho (communications protocol)Momentum (technical analysis)Time domainRadiative transferOpticsLaserAstronomical interferometerChannel (broadcasting)Quantum mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the effects of spontaneous emission (SE) on a single-state time domain atom interferometer (AI) that uses trapped Rb atoms. The AI uses two standing wave pulses separated by time $T$ to produce an echo signal at time $2T$ due to interference between momentum states. We find that SE influences both the shape of the echo signal and its periodic time-dependent amplitude in a manner consistent with theoretical predictions. The results show that the time-dependent signal from the AI is related to the effective radiative decay rate of the excited state. We also present results that test theoretical predictions for several properties of the echo formation such as the variation in momentum transfer due to the change in the angle between the traveling wave components of the excitation pulses, strength of the atom-field interaction, and the effect of spatial profile of the excitation beams. These studies are important for realizing precision measurements of the atomic fine structure constant and gravity using this interferometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the American Physical SocietySame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207