Безпечність швидкозаморожених соків із м’якоттю
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem definition. Fresh fruits and vegetables are an essential and indispensable source of biologically and physiologically active substances. However, during the cultivation plant raw materials collect contaminants of chemical nature, because of more intensive farming techniques and environmental disasters. At the same time, during storage fresh fruits and vegetables can be exposed to bacteriological damage, which causes quantitative and qualitative losses and accumulation of mycotoxins. Goal of research is to study the safety of quick-frozen juices with pulp.Methods and materials. Objects of research – quick-frozen juices with pulp received from variety of melon Amal, watermelon Khersonskyi, apples Golden Delicious, carrot Canada, celery Giant, and beetroot Bordeaux. To increase consumption value, improve organoleptic qualities, to stabilize color and consistency of quick-frozen juices we proposed to blend apple, carrot and celery juices and to add natural polysaccharide xanthan gum and ascorbic acid.Results of research. Coliform bacteria and pathogenic microorganisms, including Salmonella, were not found. It was discovered that the freezing process is a determining factor for reducing the number of mold fungi and yeasts, which are non-persistent to low temperatures. Radioactive nuclides 137Cs і 90Sr in the juices were not detected. Toxic elements, such as cadmium, mercury and arsenic also were not found. The levels of lead, cuprum and zinc were within the limits of the permissible concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".