MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Role of MLCL AT‐1 in Cardiolipin Metabolism: A potential Therapeutic approach to Barth Syndrome

2011· article· en· W2597608228 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ryan W. Mitchell, Elikana Gale, Bill A Taylor, Grant M. Hatch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersManitoba Health Research Council
KeywordsCardiolipinChemistryLymphoblastBiochemistryBiologyGeneticsCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barth Syndrome (BTHS) is a rare X‐linked genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the Tafazzin gene ( taz ), an enzyme involved in the remodelling pathway of cardiolipin (CL). Mutation in taz results in a biochemical deficiency of CL and accumulation of monolysocardiolipin (MLCL). We investigated the contribution of another enzyme, monolysocardiolipin acyltransferase‐1 (MLCL AT‐1), to the remodelling pathway of CL in human lymphoblasts. MLCL AT‐1 or taz or both were knocked down using RNAi in normal or BTHS lymphoblasts and MLCL AT‐1 enzyme activity examined. MLCL AT‐1 enzyme activity was reduced approximately 50% (p<0.05) when MLCL AT‐1 was knocked down in normal human lymphoblasts and unaltered when taz was knocked down. Knock down of both MLCL AT‐1 and taz simultaneously did not result in a further reduction in MLCL AT‐1 activity compared to knock down of MLCL AT‐1 alone. Expression of MLCL AT‐1 in BTHS lymphoblasts with different mutations in taz elevated CL synthesis and mass over 2‐fold (p<0.05) in these cells compared to controls. These studies indicate that MLCL AT‐1 may act independently of taz . This work was supported by grants from the Manitoba Health Research Council and the Barth Syndrome Foundation (USA & Canada).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→