MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Primary tumor location and survival in general population with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2017· article· en· W2597889290 on OpenAlexaff
Shahid Ahmed, Neha Papneja, Mohamed E. Emara, Riaz Alvi, Tehmina Asif, Dueck Dorie-Anna, Duc Le, Adnan Zaidi, Kamal Haider, Selliah Kanthan, Nayyer Iqbal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColorectal cancerInternal medicinePrimary tumorOncologyCohortChemotherapyPopulationProportional hazards modelMultivariate analysisGastroenterologyCancerMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

674 Background: Recent evidence from clinical trials suggests that location of the primary tumor in patients with mCRC correlates with differential outcomes and patients with tumors originating in the right side of colon have inferior survival. This large population-based cohort study using individual patient data was performed to confirm this findings in general population with mCRC. Methods: A cohort of 1947 patients who were diagnosed with synchronous mCRC from 1992-2010 was studied. Ascending and transverse colon cancers were defined as right-sided tumors (RT) and remainder tumors were define as left-sided tumors (LT). Cox proportional multivariate analyses were done to determine prognostic significance of primary tumor location and to adjust other prognostic variables including age, Charlson comorbid index (CCI) and WHO performance status (PS) in patients treated with chemotherapy. Results: Median age was 70 years (IQR: 60-78) and M:F was 1.3:1. Mean CCI was 9.7±1.4 and 29% had WHO PS of > 1. 770 (39%) patients had RT and 37% had stage IVb disease. 908 (47%) received chemotherapy and of those 44% received modern chemotherapy. Significant differences were noted between the groups with RT and LT with respect to age, WHO PS, CCI, liver metastases, mucinous tumor, grade, smoking history, and primary tumor resection. Median overall survival of patients with RT was 14 (95%CI: 12.7-15.3) months compared with 20.5 (95%CI: 18.5-22.5) of patients with LT (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis following variables were correlated with inferior survival: Right-sided tumors, hazard ratio (HR) 1.40 (95%CI: 1.20-1.60); no primary tumor resection, HR 1.60 (95%CI: 1.32-1.90); no metastasectomy, HR 2.40 (95%CI: 1.90-2.90); not using modern chemotherapy, HR 1.52 (95%CI: 1.31-1.80); leukocytosis, HR 1.44 (95%CI: 1.28-1.73); elevated CEA, HR 1.54 (95%CI: 1.30-1.90); WHO PS > 1, HR 1.30 (95%CI: 1.10-1.55); and stage IVb disease, HR 1.50 (95%CI: 1.17-1.86). Tests for interaction were negative. Conclusions: Our results confirm that patients with RT who received chemotherapy have inferior survival independent of other known prognostic variables. Future studies are required to understand underlying pathophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207