Phase II trial of erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer (PC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4609 Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a potentially important target in PC. Benefit from erlotinib (Tarceva), an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor has been associated with the presence of a skin rash. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of erlotinib, dosed to achieve a rash, in patients (pts) with PC. Methods: Erlotinib was given at an initial dose of 150 mg/day to eligible pts with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic PC who had progressed or were unable to tolerate gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The dose of erlotinib was increased by 50mg every 2 weeks (maximum 300 mg/day) until > grade 1 rash (CTCAE v 3.0) or other dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Erlotinib pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed. Baseline tumor tissue was collected for analysis of Kras mutations, EGFR by IHC and FISH. The primary endpoint of this two- stage phase II trial was prolonged disease control (PR + SD > 8 wks) with a rate of >20% assumed to be significant . Results: Fifty pts were accrued (median age 61, M:F = 25:25, ECOG 0:1:2 = 5:41:4, LA:Metastatic = 5:45, prior gemcitabine none:adjuvant:palliative = 2:16:35). 47 and 40 pts were evaluable for toxicity and response, respectively. Dose-escalation to 200–300 mg of erlotinib was possible in 9 pts. Most common treatment adverse events (TAEs) of any grade were: rash (35 pts, 74.5%), diarrhea (18 pts, 38.3 %), and fatigue (8 pts, 17%). Grade 3+ TAEs were rash in 2 pts and diarrhea in 2 pts. Best response was SD in 14 pts, 0.35 (95% CI: 0.2–0.5). Prolonged disease control (SD > 8 wks) was observed in 10/40 evaluable pts, 0.25 (95% CI: 0.12–0.38), which met the primary study endpoint. Median TTP was 1.6 mo (95% CI:1.6–2.1), mOS 4.1 mo (95% CI:3.2–7.3), and 6 mo OS rate was 39% (95%CI: 24–61%). PK and correlative data are being analyzed and will be presented. Conclusions: Erlotinib is associated with prolonged stable disease in a subset of pts with advanced refractory PC. Dose escalation in the absence of toxicity is feasible and safe. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".