MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pooled safety analysis of omacetaxine mepesuccinate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

2012· article· en· W2598103319 on OpenAlexaff
Meir Wetzler, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Franck E. Nicolini, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Luke P. Akard, Michele Baccarani, Adam Craig, Peter de Nully Brown, Jörge E. Cortes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineNeutropeniaAdverse effectTolerabilityRashGastroenterologyNauseaFebrile neutropeniaAnemiaSurgeryToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6604 Background: Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a reversible, transient inhibitor of protein elongation that does not depend on BCR-ABL signaling. It showed significant clinical activity in two phase 2, open-label, multicenter studies of patients with CML who were resistant/intolerant to prior TKI therapy. However, omacetaxine tolerability data across the 3 phases of CML are limited. Methods: Safety data were pooled from all patients in the 2 studies plus a small pilot study. Omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2 was given subcutaneously twice daily: ≤14 successive days per 28-day cycle for induction, ≤7 days/cycle as maintenance. Days of dosing could be adjusted and recombinant growth factors given, as clinically indicated. Results: Of 207 pooled patients (median age, 57 years), 108 were in chronic (CP), 55 in accelerated (AP), and 44 in blast phase (BP). Median treatment was 4 cycles (range, 1–41). On study, 80% of patients had ≥1 hematologic adverse event (AE), 60% had a serious AE (SAE), 30% had a hematologic SAE, 34% had an SAE that resulted in hospitalization, and 15% discontinued treatment due to an SAE (most commonly disease progression). There were 49 (24%) deaths (15 CP, 11 AP, and 23 BP). Of the 8 that were treatment related (5 CP, 2 AP, 1 BP), the most common cause was sepsis (3 patients). The most common AEs were thrombocytopenia (60%), anemia (51%), diarrhea (40%), neutropenia (37%), and nausea (30%). Injection site reactions (eg, injection site pain, erythema) occurred in 32%, with the majority being low grade. Infections (eg, pneumonia, bronchitis) occurred in 51%. Treatment-related grade 3/4 hematologic AEs included thrombocytopenia (52%), neutropenia (31%), anemia (30%), leukopenia (12%), and febrile neutropenia (11%). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 nonhematologic AE was fatigue (4.3%). Overall, there were 34 (16%) grade 3/4 infections (12 CP, 11 AP, 11 BP). Conclusions: In the largest safety analysis to date, subcutaneous omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2 showed an acceptable safety profile in all phases of CML. AEs were primarily hematologic, and grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were not common. Support: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207