The Impact of Self Esteem, Family Rituals, Religiosity, and Participation in Conforming Activities upon Delinquency: A Comparison of Young Adults in Turkey and the United States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crime occurs in all societies and researchers all over the world have sought to identify the antecedents of deviant behavior. Two studies of young adults, one in the United States and one in Turkey, explored whether family rituals, and selfesteem might contribute to social control and consequently reduce deviant behavior. Inaddition, the Turkish study assessed the impact of religiosity on social control, while the U.S. study assessed the impact of participation in conforming activities. Based on W alter Reckless’ Containment Theory, it was proposed that the inner containment concepts of self-esteem and religiosity and the outer containment concepts of family rituals and participation in conforming activities would reduce the number of delinquent behaviors committed by the respondents. In Turkey data were gathered from 205 incarcerated respondents and 200 college students in 2007. Data were gathered in the U.S. from 207 incarcerated respondents and 217 college students in 1998. Respondents in both nations completed the Family Rituals Questionnaire, the Culture Free Self-Esteem Inventory, and a Family Information Inventory. The Religious Background and Behavior Questionnaire was only completed by the Turkish respondents. The incarcerated groups in each nation differed significantly from the college student on the major research variables. The major research variables did not account for any significant variance in delinquent behavior except for participation in conforming activities for the U.S. college students. Social risk factors were better predictors of deviant behavior in both nations. National context had minimal impact on deviant behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".