MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Does combined dose intensification radiotherapy improve disease control in resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma? Long-term results of a phase I/II trial.

2012· article· en· W2598494804 on OpenAlexaff
Myles Smith, Paul F. Ridgway, Charles Catton, Amanda J. Cannell, Brian O’Sullivan, Lynn Mikula, J. Jones, Carol J. Swallow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalLakeridge HealthPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyExternal beam radiotherapyAbdomenStage (stratigraphy)CohortSurgeryLog-rank testProspective cohort studySurvival analysisBrachytherapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10050 Background: Late failure is a challenging problem in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) and reported 10 yr overall survival (OS) rates range from 20-30%. Use of preoperative external beam radiotherapy (XRT) in the management of RPS remains controversial. No RCT and very few prospective trials of any type have been completed. We investigated the effects of preop XRT plus dose escalation with early postop brachytherapy (BT) on long term survival and recurrence in RPS. Methods: From 06/96 to 10/00, 40 patients (25 female) with resectable RPS were entered onto a phase I/II trial of preop XRT (50 Gy) plus postop BT (20-25 Gy). As previously reported, BT to the upper abdomen was associated with significant grade III-V postop toxicity, and from 12/98 on, BT was applied only to cases where the “field at risk” excluded the upper abdomen. Kaplan Meier survival curves were constructed; OS and recurrence free survival (RFS) were compared by log rank (SPSS 19.0). Results: Median age at study entry was 58 (38-70) yrs. Twenty nine patients presented to our center with primary disease (73%), and 22 (55%) had high grade tumors. All patients had preop XRT and total gross resection, while half (n=19) received BT. As of 12/2011, median follow-up time is 108 mos. For the entire study cohort, OS at 5 and 10 yrs were 70% and 65%, respectively; RFS at 5 and 10 yrs were 65% and 58%, respectively. RFS at 5 yrs was reduced in high vs. low grade RPS (50% vs. 83%, p=0.028), but by 10 yrs. was similar in high and low grade tumors (50% vs. 67%, p=ns). RFS was reduced in patients who presented with recurrent vs. primary disease (27% vs. 69% at 10 yrs., p=0.018), as was OS (36% vs. 76% at 10 yrs., p=0.034). Neither OS nor RFS was improved in the cohort of patients who received BT compared to the cohort who did not: at 10 yrs. RFS was 53% +BT and 62% -BT, while OS was 53% and 76%, respectively, p=ns. Conclusions: In this prospective study with mature follow-up, long term OS and RFS in patients who underwent combined preop XRT plus resection of RPS compare favorably with those reported in retrospective institutional and population-based series. Postoperative BT did not contribute to disease control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→