MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Permanent seed brachytherapy for low risk prostate cancer, long term outcome, and urinary toxicity.

2017· article· en· W2598709449 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Raziee, Alejandro Berlín, Peter Chung, Joelle Helou, Haiyan Jiang, Juanita Crook, Charles Catton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeBrachytherapyProstate cancerUrologyUrinary systemMedian follow-upCancerSurgeryInternal medicineRadiation therapyOverall survival

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

66 Background: Low dose rate seed brachytherapy is an established treatment modality for low risk prostate cancer (CaP). Herein, we report long term biochemical control and urinary toxicity from a single institution. Methods: Data from a prospectively-collected institutional database was used, completed with retrospective chart reviews. All patients with low-risk CaP (NCCN criteria) who underwent ultrasound-guided permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy from March 1999 to December 2005 were included. Urinary function was evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). PSA relapse was defined by Phoenix Criteria (nadir + 2 ng/ml). Time to IPSS return-to-baseline score ±3 was recorded. Results: 582 patients with a median age of 64 years were included. Median initial PSA was 5.5 ng/ml (0.3-10). 66% and 34% were T1 and T2a, respectively. Gleason score was 6 (96%) and < 6 (4%). Prescription dose was 145Gy, with a median V100 coverage of 94% (IQR [interquartile range] 89-97%) and median D90 of 157Gy (IQR 144-171 Gy). With a median follow up of 131 months (IQR 94-149 months), 27 patients showed biochemical failure (4.6%), and PSA bounce was detected in 38 cases (7%). Biochemical progression-free rates were 97% (96-98%), 96% (94-97%), and 94% (91-96%) at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Median PSA level at 5, 10 and 15 years was 0.06, 0.05 and 0.018 ng/ml, respectively. PSA relapses were observed out to 148 months. At 1, 5, 10 and 15 years, 5.5%, 16.5%, 39.5% and 89.2% of patients were lost to PSA follow up. Median baseline IPSS score was 5. In 515 (88.5%) patients IPSS returned to baseline, with a median time to return-to-baseline of 9 months. The proportion of return-to-baseline at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 62%, 75%, 88%, and 90%, respectively. 22 (4%) patients required post-implant urinary catheter. After 3, 6 and 12 months, 9 (1.5%), 6 (1%) and 4 (0.7%) patients continued to be catheterized. Conclusions: Within the limits of retrospective analysis, permanent seed brachytherapy for low risk prostate cancer is an effective treatment modality with low urinary toxicity. Treatment resulted in excellent long-term biochemical control although late relapses were observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→