Phase II study of AVR118 in the management of cancer related anorexia/cachexia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e20631 Background: AVR118 represents a new class of cytoprotective drugs in managing symptoms associated with anorexia\/ cachexia. In a previous study in patients with advanced HIV-AIDS, an improvement in appetite, strength and alertness was noted. The precise mechanism of action is not understood, but activity may be related to AVR118's adenosine based components. Other active components include guanosine and branched chain amino acids leucine and valine. Objective: To determine the effect of AVR118 on appetite, early satiety and nutritional intake in patients with advanced cancer. Secondary endpoints include changes in performance status, lean muscle mass and quality of Life (QOL). Methods: Eligible adult patients received 4.0 ml of AVR118 subcutaneous daily injections. Patients underwent bi-monthly evaluations during the 28 day initial treatment (phase A) Evaluations included Karnofsky performance status, Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale (ESAS), Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), Simmonds Functional Assessment, Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index, Weight, Lean Body Mass, skin fold thickness and grip strength. Patients who benefited from phase A could elect to continue with therapy (phase B). Results: Currently, of 16 enrolled patients 7 have completed phase A. All 7 patients chose to continue with AVR118 treatment (phase B). Improvements in anorexia and PG-SGA scores were seen in 7/7 and 6/7 patients respectively. Weight stabilization or gain was observed in 5/7 patients. All other parameters showed no significant difference. There was AVR118 has been well tolerated and no serious side effects have been reported. Conclusions: Based on these positive results, the primary endpoints have been achieved and the study will be expanded from 14 to 30 patients. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".