The available intravenous iron formulations: History, efficacy, and toxicology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of intravenous iron formulations have been developed over the past 65 years which rely on dextran or other compounds to prevent uncontrolled release of free iron to the circulation. High molecular weight dextran was associated with a number of serious adverse reactions and was removed from markets worldwide in 2009. The preponderance of published evidence suggests that the formulations of parenteral iron currently available in the United States, including low molecular weight iron dextran, are all safe and effective and there are no major, clinically important differences among them in terms of either efficacy or safety. For patients with chemotherapy induced anemia or with anemia of end stage renal disease who are being treated with hemodialysis, it is reasonable to use any of the iron formulations, including iron sucrose and ferric gluconate, as frequent patient encounters with health caregivers are a routine part of care and the need to administer multiple low doses of IV iron is not a major disadvantage. However, a single infusion of a total iron dose is as effective and safe when giving iron preparations containing low molecular weight iron dextran, ferumoxytol, iron isomaltoside, or ferric carboxymaltose. Use of a single total dose infusion results in a decreased number of intravenous infusions with a lower cumulative risk for infusion reactions or extravasations, a reduced need for multiple office visits and repeated utilization of medical staff, and increased convenience for physicians and patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".