MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599053586 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2017.2688468

Silicon-Based Integrated Tunable Fractional Order Photonic Temporal Differentiators

2017· article· en· W2599053586 on OpenAlexafffund
Weilin Liu, Weifeng Zhang, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsDifferentiatorPhotonicsSilicon photonicsSilicon on insulatorInterferometryOptoelectronicsOpticsPhysicsMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceSiliconTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two integrated fractional-order photonic temporal differentiators based on two Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) structures implemented on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform are designed, fabricated, and experimentally evaluated. The first photonic temporal differentiator employs a multimode interference (MMI) coupler as one of the two 3-dB couplers of the MZI. By changing the polarization state of the input optical signal, the coupling coefficient of the MMI is changed, which leads to the change of the phase shift in the destructive interference wavelength, and a photonic temporal differentiator with a tunable fractional order is implemented. The second photonic temporal differentiator is designed to have two cascaded MZIs, a balanced MZI, and an unbalanced MZI. A phase modulator (PM) is incorporated in one of the two arms of each of the MZIs. The balanced MZI with a PM forms an active tunable coupler, which is used to actively tune the fractional order of the temporal differentiator. The PM in the unbalanced MZI is used to tune the operating wavelength. The two photonic temporal differentiators are designed and fabricated in a CMOS compatible SOI platform, and their performance is evaluated experimentally. The experimental results show that both temporal differentiators can have a tunable fractional order from 0 to 1. In addition, the use of the active temporal differentiator to perform high-speed coding with a data rate of 16 Gb/s is experimentally evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207