First-line monotherapy with nivolumab (NIVO; anti-programmed death-1 [PD-1]) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Safety, efficacy and correlation of outcomes with PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8025 Background: NIVO, a fully human IgG4 PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, has demonstrated durable responses and tolerability in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. This phase I study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NIVO monotherapy in pts with chemotherapy naïve advanced NSCLC. Methods: Pts (N=52) with squamous (SQ) or non-SQ advanced NSCLC received NIVO 3 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression or unacceptable toxicity (post-progression treatment was permitted per protocol). Response (RECIST v1.1) was evaluated overall, by histology and by tumor PD-L1 expression (PD-L1+: ≥5% tumor cells expressing PD-L1). Results: Objective response rate (ORR) was 21%, with 3 confirmed complete responses; 9/11 responders (82%) achieved response by first scan (wk 11). Median duration of response (mDOR) was not reached (NR; range, 7.6+, 85.6+ wks); 9 pts (82%) had ongoing responses at last tumor assessment, with a minimum follow-up of 8 mos in all pts. Two pts had unconventional immune-pattern responses with 35% and 43% maximum reductions in target lesions, respectively, and simultaneous appearance of new lesions (not reported as responders). Median overall survival (mOS) was 98.3 wks (range, 1.0, 104.4+). Objective responses were observed in both PD-L1+ and PD-L1– pts, with ORR higher in pts with PD-L1+tumors. Eight pts (15%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events, including rash (n=2), increased amylase/lipase, increased AST/ALT, hyperglycemia, cardiac failure, lung infection, and pneumonitis (n=1 each). Conclusions: First-line NIVO demonstrated durable responses, encouraging survival and a tolerable safety profile in pts with advanced NSCLC. Although response rates were higher in PD-L1+ pts, OS was encouraging in both PD-L1+ and PD-L1– pts. Updated OS and safety data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01454102. ORR mDOR mOS n/N (%) wks (range) All pts 11/52 (21) NR (7.6+, 85.6+) 98.3 (1.0, 104.4+) Non-SQ 9/39 (23) NR (7.6+, 85.6+) NR (1.0, 104.4+) SQ 2/13 (15) NR (46.9+, 77.3+) 73.1 (13.3, 87.3+) PD-L1+ 8/26 (31) NR (7.6+, 85.6+) NR (1.0, 103.3+) PD-L1 2/21 (10) NR (13.0+, 24.1+) 98.3 (8.0, 104.4+)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".