Sources and ecology of Escherichia coli in pulp and paper mill biosolids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulp and paper mills generate biosolids as a by-product of their effluent treatment systems. These biosolids show excellent potential as a soil conditioner. However, the detection of high levels of E. coli (10 2 to 105 CFU/gdw), in the absence of any significant fecal loading, has caused concern among effluent treatment system operators, land applicators and regulators. This research examines the sources and ecology of E. coli strains comprising the population of E. coli in the biosolids of an eastern Ontario pulp and paper mill by applying the molecular microbial source-tracking tool repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Confirmed E. coli were successfully isolated from 2 forested sites, treated mill process feed water, storm effluent, mill fibres, wood chips, primary and secondary clarifier effluents and sludges, and biosolids. While laboratory isolates could be accurately distinguished from forest and industrial isolates, cluster and jackknife analyses were incapable of differentiating reliably among isolates from the forest, on-site inputs, effluent treatment system and biosolids (average rates of correct classification values ranged from 43.9% to 72.9%). No input could be excluded as a source of E. coli to the effluent treatment system. Many fingerprint types were unique to the primary and secondary clarifiers; however, only a subset of the fingerprint types recovered from the primary and secondary clarifiers were detected in the biosolids. This suggests that the E. coli strains found in mill biosolids were those able to survive the hot, desiccating conditions of dewatering. Highly similar fingerprint types (> 80% similarity) were recovered repeatedly over an 8-month period from the effluent treatment system (primary and secondary clarifiers) and biosolids. These results are consistent with growth within the effluent treatment system and biosolids, rather than fecal loading. Over a 3-year period the pulp and paper mill effluent treatment system underwent large-scale changes, including a 50% reduction in effluent volume upon the elimination of on-site pulping activities. New fingerprint types were detected in the biosolids following the restructuring, and the Shannon index of diversity increased. Disruption of established operating conditions could have opened niches, allowing new strains to colonize the mill effluent treatment system successfully.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Observational | high |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | medium |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".