On Accelerationism—Decolonizing Technoscience through Critical Pedagogy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics (MAP) begins with the now numbingly routine observation that the world is facing a number of impending catastrophes stemming from the degradation of the planetary bios and the unfettered expansion of global capitalism. What makes the MAP unique from scores of other meditations on impending “ cataclysm ” is that it suggests contemporary crises are rooted largely in a failure of radical-progressive imagination. It argues that the left has simply not been able to pose a credible alternative to neoliberalism. This is because progressive politics have failed to offer alternative visions of the future and have instead stalled out, either advocating for a nostalgic return to Keynesian era social democracy that is neither possible nor desirable - (Fordism was always predicated on class, race, and gender hierarchies as well as an international system of imperialism and colonies -), and/or retreating into a horizontal politics of neo-primitive localism that is incapable of adequately dealing with real historical and political conditions, such as imagining global governance structures needed to address issues like demilitarization and climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it