Host–Guest Interaction at Molecular Interfaces: Binding of Cucurbit[7]uril on Ferrocenyl Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ferrocene (Fc)-encapsulated cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) supramolecular host–guest complex (Fc@CB[7]) as a synthetic recognition pair has been widely adapted for coupling biomolecules and nanomaterials due to its ultrahigh binding affinity. In this paper, we have explored the binding of CB[7] on binary ferrocenylundecanethiolate/octanethiolate self-assembled monolayer on gold (FcC11S-/C8S-Au), a model system to develop our understanding of host–guest chemistry at molecular interfaces. It has been shown that upon incubation with CB[7] solution the redox behavior of FcC11S-/C8S-Au changes remarkably; i.e., a new pair of peaks appeared at more positive potential with narrowed widths. The ease of quantitation of surface bound-redox species (Fc + /Fc and Fc + @CB[7]/ Fc@CB[7]) enabled us to determine the thermodynamic formation constant of Fc@CB[7] at FcC11S-/C8S-Au (7.3 ± 1.8 × 10 4 M –1 ). With time-dependent redox responses, we were able to, for the first time, deduce both the binding and dissociation rate constants, 2.8 ± 0.3 × 10 3 M −1 s −1 and 0.08 ± 0.01 s –1, respectively. These results showed substantial differences both thermodynamically and kinetically for the formation of host–guest inclusion complex at molecular interfaces with respect to solution-diffused, homogeneous environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".