Experimentally-based ExB drifts in the DIII-D divertor and SOL calculated from integration of Ohm's law using Thomson scattering measurements of Te and ne
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2D spatial distributions of cross field drift velocities are calculated from 2D Thomson scattering measurements of Te and ne in the divertor and SOL of DIII-D. In contrast with the method that has been used on DIII-D where the 2D distribution of plasma potential Vplasma is obtained from measurements of the probe floating potential of reciprocating probes, the present method does not require insertion of a probe into the plasma and can therefore be used in high power discharges. The 2D spatial distribution of Vplasma is calculated from Ohm's Law for the parallel electric field E|| along each flux tube, E∥(s∥)=−1.71dTe/ds∥−(Te/ne)dne/ds∥, where the Thomson scattering values of Te and ne are used. To within a constant of integration, Vplasma is obtained by integrating E|| along the flux-tubes (field lines); the constant is obtained for each flux tube using the sheath drop at the target calculated from the characteristic of Langmuir probes built into the divertor tiles. The 2D distributions of Eradial=−dVp/dsradial, Epoloidal=−dVp/dspoloidal, vExBpoloidal=Eradial/B and vExBradial=Epoloidal/B are then calculated as well as the particle drift flux densities ΓExBpoloidal=nvExBpoloidal and ΓExBradial=nvExBradial for electrons, fuel ions and impurity ions, using the appropriate values of particle density, n.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it