MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599561855 · doi:10.1016/j.nme.2017.03.021

Experimentally-based ExB drifts in the DIII-D divertor and SOL calculated from integration of Ohm's law using Thomson scattering measurements of Te and ne

2017· article· en· W2599561855 on OpenAlexaff
P.C. Stangeby, J.D. Elder, A.G. McLean, J.G. Watkins

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Materials and Energy · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFusion Energy SciencesOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsDivertorThomson scatteringAtomic physicsLangmuir probePlasmaDIII-DScatteringPlasma diagnosticsIonElectron temperatureElectronElectric fieldPhysicsTokamakOpticsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2D spatial distributions of cross field drift velocities are calculated from 2D Thomson scattering measurements of Te and ne in the divertor and SOL of DIII-D. In contrast with the method that has been used on DIII-D where the 2D distribution of plasma potential Vplasma is obtained from measurements of the probe floating potential of reciprocating probes, the present method does not require insertion of a probe into the plasma and can therefore be used in high power discharges. The 2D spatial distribution of Vplasma is calculated from Ohm's Law for the parallel electric field E|| along each flux tube, E∥(s∥)=−1.71dTe/ds∥−(Te/ne)dne/ds∥, where the Thomson scattering values of Te and ne are used. To within a constant of integration, Vplasma is obtained by integrating E|| along the flux-tubes (field lines); the constant is obtained for each flux tube using the sheath drop at the target calculated from the characteristic of Langmuir probes built into the divertor tiles. The 2D distributions of Eradial=−dVp/dsradial, Epoloidal=−dVp/dspoloidal, vExBpoloidal=Eradial/B and vExBradial=Epoloidal/B are then calculated as well as the particle drift flux densities ΓExBpoloidal=nvExBpoloidal and ΓExBradial=nvExBradial for electrons, fuel ions and impurity ions, using the appropriate values of particle density, n.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Materials and EnergySame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207