<i> L’Orientale allégorie: le conte oriental au <scp>xviii</scp> <sup>e</sup> siècle en France (1704–1774) </i> . Par J <scp>ean-</scp> F <scp>rançois</scp> P <scp>errin</scp> <i> L’Orientale allégorie: le conte oriental au <scp>xviii</scp> <sup>e</sup> siècle en France (1704–1774) </i> . Par PerrinJean-François. (Dix-huitièmes siècles, 186). Paris: Honoré Champion, 2015. 312 pp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this book Jean-François Perrin traces the naturalization of the oriental tale by French writers, starting with the publication of Antoine Galland’s Mille et une nuits in 1704, and ending, seventy years later, with Voltaire’s Taureau blanc. The Introduction sets out the book’s three central themes, the first being the idea that the early French orientalists, including Jean Chardin, Barthélemy d’Herbelot, François Pétis de La Croix, and Galland, were people of great learning, committed to compiling and diffusing authentic knowledge about Asia, specifically its languages, literatures, and cultures. The achievements of these authors are a monument of European civilization and, according to Perrin, an expression of the ‘meilleur esprit des Lumières’ (p. 23). The second of the book’s themes is one that is more familiar: the depiction of the Orient as a foil to Europe. Following Galland, the great public debates of the eighteenth century were often presented through an oriental looking glass, the best-known example of this being Montesquieu’s Lettres persanes. Visitors from the East provided a convenient way of commenting on French society through foreign (and ingenuous) eyes. Readers laugh at the visitors and their observations, but then discover — too late — that they are laughing at themselves. The third theme is closely related to this. Perrin argues that Antoine Hamilton adapted the conte oriental in works such as Le Bélier and Les Quatre Facardins (1730), re-inventing the genre in a self-conscious and satirical vein. According to Perrin, two branches of French literature were directly influenced by Hamilton’s reading of Galland: Crébillon’s libertine novel and Voltaire’s philosophical tales. The affiliation with Voltaire is unmistakeable: Hamilton’s predilection for persiflage and double-entendre seems ready-made for the author of Zadig. The case of Crébillon is different: more dream-like and erotic in its approach than Voltaire, and less concerned with verisimilitude. Organized into four parts (‘Genèses’, ‘Poétiques’, ‘Problématiques’, and ‘Épilogue’), Perrin’s book examines how the oriental tale crossed over into French literature and mixed with established genres such as the conte merveilleux and the heroic novel. This first part draws attention to the stylistic and thematic innovations introduced by Galland, highlighting his seminal influence in a society ripe for change. The second part examines the deconstruction of the genre and its renewal under the guise of the libertine novel. The third part looks at a number of themes allegedly inspired by the oriental tale (and taken up by Enlightenment writers) including power and illusion, identity, gender differences, and the transmigration of souls. This is an engaging and original book. The discovery of the East through Galland and his followers encouraged Enlightenment thinkers to reconsider the idea of history as it was then understood. At the same time, the genre’s inherent dépaysement created the distance necessary — a point of view — to see the familiar in new ways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".