MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599780783 · doi:10.1093/fs/knx039

<i> L’Orientale allégorie: le conte oriental au <scp>xviii</scp> <sup>e</sup> siècle en France (1704–1774) </i> . Par J <scp>ean-</scp> F <scp>rançois</scp>  P <scp>errin</scp> <i> L’Orientale allégorie: le conte oriental au <scp>xviii</scp> <sup>e</sup> siècle en France (1704–1774) </i> . Par PerrinJean-François. (Dix-huitièmes siècles, 186). Paris: Honoré Champion, 2015. 312 pp.

2017· article· fr· W2599780783 on OpenAlexaff
Édouard Langille

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)DepictionCivilizationArtEgyptologyArt historyHumanitiesLiteratureHistoryClassicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this book Jean-François Perrin traces the naturalization of the oriental tale by French writers, starting with the publication of Antoine Galland’s Mille et une nuits in 1704, and ending, seventy years later, with Voltaire’s Taureau blanc. The Introduction sets out the book’s three central themes, the first being the idea that the early French orientalists, including Jean Chardin, Barthélemy d’Herbelot, François Pétis de La Croix, and Galland, were people of great learning, committed to compiling and diffusing authentic knowledge about Asia, specifically its languages, literatures, and cultures. The achievements of these authors are a monument of European civilization and, according to Perrin, an expression of the ‘meilleur esprit des Lumières’ (p. 23). The second of the book’s themes is one that is more familiar: the depiction of the Orient as a foil to Europe. Following Galland, the great public debates of the eighteenth century were often presented through an oriental looking glass, the best-known example of this being Montesquieu’s Lettres persanes. Visitors from the East provided a convenient way of commenting on French society through foreign (and ingenuous) eyes. Readers laugh at the visitors and their observations, but then discover — too late — that they are laughing at themselves. The third theme is closely related to this. Perrin argues that Antoine Hamilton adapted the conte oriental in works such as Le Bélier and Les Quatre Facardins (1730), re-inventing the genre in a self-conscious and satirical vein. According to Perrin, two branches of French literature were directly influenced by Hamilton’s reading of Galland: Crébillon’s libertine novel and Voltaire’s philosophical tales. The affiliation with Voltaire is unmistakeable: Hamilton’s predilection for persiflage and double-entendre seems ready-made for the author of Zadig. The case of Crébillon is different: more dream-like and erotic in its approach than Voltaire, and less concerned with verisimilitude. Organized into four parts (‘Genèses’, ‘Poétiques’, ‘Problématiques’, and ‘Épilogue’), Perrin’s book examines how the oriental tale crossed over into French literature and mixed with established genres such as the conte merveilleux and the heroic novel. This first part draws attention to the stylistic and thematic innovations introduced by Galland, highlighting his seminal influence in a society ripe for change. The second part examines the deconstruction of the genre and its renewal under the guise of the libertine novel. The third part looks at a number of themes allegedly inspired by the oriental tale (and taken up by Enlightenment writers) including power and illusion, identity, gender differences, and the transmigration of souls. This is an engaging and original book. The discovery of the East through Galland and his followers encouraged Enlightenment thinkers to reconsider the idea of history as it was then understood. At the same time, the genre’s inherent dépaysement created the distance necessary — a point of view — to see the familiar in new ways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207