The Role of Family Typology on Mental Health, Positive and Negative Emotions, Self-esteem, and Wife Physical Abuse in an Iranian Sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the roles of the cohesive, enmeshed and disengaged families on the mental health, positive and negative emotions, self-esteem and wife abuse in married couples, to investigate relationships between these constructs, and to explore the effects of gender and the level of education on aforesaid variables. Participants included 100 couples that randomly selected from Shiraz city, Iran. A demographic questionnaire and four selfrating measures were used in this study. Resulting data indicated that cohesive families had a significantly lower psychopathology, negative emotions and the wi fc physical abuse and a higher positive emotions and self-esteem than both enmeshed and disengaged families. Psychopathology factors were positively correlated to negative emotions and wife physical abuse, and they had significantly negative relationships with positive emotions and self-esteem. Results were confirmed the effects of family typology on the mental health. Negative emotions and self-esteem were predicted the wife physical abuse in this sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".