Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente estudo discute o uso da interatividade em centros, museus e exposicoes de ciencia como facilitador do processo de aprendizagem de conceitos cientificos, considerando a importância da divulgacao cientifica para a democratizacao da sociedade. Para tanto, analisa a exposicao Ciencia para a Vida, organizada pela Embrapa, na qual sao apresentados tecnologias e produtos desenvolvidos pela empresa, com avaliacao dos formatos utilizados e dos aparatos criados para esse fim. Estende-se ainda para analisar outras tres instituicoes - Museu da Vida, da Fiocruz, no Rio de Janeiro; Museo Participativo de Ciencias, em Buenos Aires, Argentina; Museums Nature Montreal, no Canada - capazes de servir como modelo para novos trabalhos de divulgacao cientifica no Brasil. Palavras-chave Exposicao; Interatividade; Embrapa; Ciencia para a Vida. Abstract This study discusses the use of interactivity in centers, museums and science exhibitions as a facilitator in the learning process of scientific concepts, especially due to the importance of science diffusion for democratization in the society. With that purpose, it analyzes the exposition, Ciencia para a Vida, organized by Embrapa, where are presented technologies and products developed by the company, with an evaluation of the formats used and the devices created for that purpose. Furthermore it analyzes three other institutions - Museu da Vida, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro; Museo Participativo de Ciencias, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Museums Nature Montreal, Canada - capable of serving as models for further work in the popularization of science in Brazil. Resumen La proposicion de este estudio es discutir la interactividad en centros, museos y exposiciones de ciencia como facilitador del proceso de aprendizaje de conceptos cientificos, sobretodo considerando la importancia de la divulgacion cientifica para la democratizacion de la sociedad. Por lo tanto, analiza la exposicion Ciencia para a Vida, organizada por la empresa brasilena Embrapa, donde son presentados tecnologias y productos desarrollados por la empresa, con evaluacion de los formatos utilizados y de los aparatos criados a tal finalidad. Se anade a este estudio otras tres instituciones - Museu da Vida, de Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro; Museo Participativo de Ciencias, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Museums Nature Montreal, Canada - todas capazes de funcionar como modelo para nuevas practicas de divulgacion cientifica en Brasil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".