MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Significance of plasma osteopontin (OPN) as a biomarker in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue.

2013· article· en· W2600015683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Madan Lal Brahma Bhatt, Vikas Srivastava, Durga Prasad Mishra, Madhu Mati Goel, Divya Mehrotra, Kirti Srivastava, Rishi K. Gara

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteopontinMedicineInternal medicineUrologyRadiation therapyBiomarkerCancerGastroenterologyOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e17020 Background: Osteopontin (OPN) is an integrin-binding glycoprotein and its upregulation plays an important role in cancer progression. We analysed plasma OPN levels in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue (SCCT) patients, and healthy controls. We evaluated the relationship between plasma OPN level and outcome to therapy in the patients. Methods: Plasma OPN levels in 54 patients of SCCT and 18 healthy controls were measured by ELISA method. All participants gave written consent to participate in the study. Patients were subjected to chemo-radiotherapy using tele-cobalt radiotherapy machine (Theratron 780 C, AECL, Ottawa). A dose of 70 Gy of radiation was delivered to all the patients in 7 weeks with 2 Gy fraction size, 5 days a week by shrinking field technique. Chemotherapy was given in the form of Inj cisplatinum 30 mg/m2 IVI weekly, during the course of treatment with hydration, diuresis and anti-emetics. The data was analysed by using SPSS version 11.5 software. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The plasma OPN levels of the SCCT ranged from 29.53 ng/mL- 514.52 ng/mL (mean and SE; 229.94 ± 21.96 ng/mL), which were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than those of the controls which ranged from 12.45 ng/mL- 109.46 ng/mL (mean± SE; 50.69 ± 6.83 ng/mL). The patients with advanced T stage (T3/T4 vs.T1/T2) and positive N status (N +ve vs N-ve) had significantly higher plasma levels of OPN (p < 0.0001 and 0.001 respectively). The Kalpan-Meier survival curves for overall survival of patients with advanced T stage, positive N status or advanced TNM stage were significantly lower than that of patients with early T stage, negative N status or early TNM stage, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that OPN may be a predictive biomarker for poor outcome to radio-chemotherapy (95% CI = 0.081–0.293, p < 0.005). Conclusions: Our results suggested that the evaluation of plasma OPN levels may be a useful biomarker for diagnosis and prediction of response to radio-chemotherapy in SCCT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207