MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600214014 · doi:10.2527/asasmw.2017.12.191

191 Nutrient digestibility of mash, steam pelleted, and extruded barley and faba bean in growing pigs

2017· article· en· W2600214014 on OpenAlex
Urbano dos Santos Ruiz, G. Calzada Luna, L. F. Wang, E. Beltranena, R. T. Zijlstra

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Canadian institutionsAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomyBiologyNutrientAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steam pelleting and extrusion are heat processing technologies that can increase the nutritional value of feedstuffs for pigs. Thus, the nutritional quality of barley and faba bean in mash, steam pelleted, and extruded forms was evaluated in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement in growing pigs. The apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of GE, starch, CP, and AA, the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA and CP, and the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of GE were measured. The 2 feedstuffs were either fed as mash (2.8-mm hammer mill screen), steam pelleted (California Pellet Mill, Crawfordsville, IN), or extruded (X115, Wenger, Sabetha, KS). Seven crossbred ileal-cannulated barrows (54.3 ± 3.9 kg) were fed diets containing 96.5% of each of the 6 test feedstuffs and a N-free diet, in a 7 × 7 Latin square. Pigs were fed at 2.8 × maintenance DE for seven 9-d periods (sequentially 5 d adaptation and 2 d collections of feces and digesta). Data were analyzed by ANOVA using the mixed procedure. The 3 faba bean and 3 barley samples contained (DM basis) 28.2–29.7% and 12.0–12.3% CP, 8.62–9.90% and 4.66–5.73% ADF, and 4.37–4.39 and 4.44–4.46 Mcal/kg GE, respectively. Feedstuffs and processing interacted (P < 0.05) for AID and SID of CP, AA, AID of starch, ATTD of GE, DE value, and predicted NE value. Steam pelleting faba bean increased (P < 0.05) the AID of CP, Ile, Leu, Met, Val, and starch by 3–12%, the SID of these AA and Phe by 3–9% and of CP (84.9% vs. 89.2%), and the predicted NE value (4%), and tended to increase (P = 0.06) the AID of GE (68.8% vs. 73.0%), compared to mash. Extruding faba bean increased (P < 0.05) the AID of Ile, Leu, Met, Phe, Thr, Val, and starch by 3–10%, and the SID of these AA by 3–9%, and tended to increase (P = 0.06) the AID of GE (68.8% vs. 72.8%), compared to mash. Steam pelleting barley increased (P < 0.05) the ATTD of GE (80.4% vs. 82.9%), DE value, and predicted NE value compared to mash. Extruding barley increased (P < 0.05) the ATTD of GE (80.4% vs. 83.1%), DE value, and predicted NE value compared to mash. The greater efficacy of heat processing for faba bean than barley indicates that the protein and starch matrix is more resistant to digestion in ground faba bean than in ground barley.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it