Cognitive function and fatigue in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients: A prospective longitudinal controlled study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9021 Background: A subset of cancer patients has cognitive impairment and fatigue after chemotherapy (CTh). We evaluated these symptoms and potential mechanisms in CRC patients and healthy controls (HC). Methods: Cognitive function was evaluated in CRC patients and HC at baseline (pre-CTh), 6 and 12 months. Group 1A (Stage II/III) received CTh and Gr 1B (Stage I/II) no CTh. Gr 2 had limited metastatic CRC. All subjects completed cognitive assessment and questionnaires for fatigue, QOL, anxiety/depression, and perceived cognitive function. Blood tests evaluated: 10 cytokines, clotting factors, sex hormones, CEA, CBC and apolipoprotein genotyping as potential causal factors. Primary endpoints: cognitive function and fatigue (Gr. 1A & 1B) at 12 months. Associations between results and demographic and disease-related factors were sought. Results: 359 CRC patients (173 Gr 1A, 116 Gr 1B, 70 Gr. 2) and 72 HC were assessed. Median age 58 (23-75 years); 58% male. Cognitive impairment: baseline Gr 1A 34% vs 1B 32.5% (p=.9), Gr 1 33% vs HC 10% (p<0.001); 12 months Gr 1A 21% vs 1B 16% (p=0.43), Gr 1 19% vs HC 2% (p=0.001). Cognitive domains most affected: verbal & visual memory, processing speed. Men had greater impairment than women (p<0.009). Cognitive decline from 0-12 months: Gr 1A 30%, Gr 1B 19%, Gr 2 24%, and HC 16%. Perceived cognitive impairment at 12 months: Gr 1A 19% vs 1B 7% (p=.04), Gr 1 14% vs HC 0% (p=.009). Fatigue was greatest in Gr 1A (70%) at 6 months; at 12 months Gr. 1A 46% vs 1B 31% (p=0.056), Gr 2 60%, HC 36%. Cytokines were elevated in CRC patients compared to HC. No association was found with cognitive function and: fatigue, QOL, anxiety/depression, cytokines, sex hormones, clotting factors, CEA or apoE genotype. Objective cognitive function was associated with perceived cognitive function at baseline only. Fatigue at baseline was associated with hemoglobin and at 12 months with neutrophil count. Conclusions: Compared to HC, CRC patients had more cognitive impairment at baseline, 6 and 12 months; but impairment was not significantly different between those who did and did not receive CTh. The mechanisms of cognitive impairment remain unknown. Fatigue improved with time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".